Do we have any similar data which shows how neglected certain users are? I would be interesting in knowing for a given user what is the average time it takes for their patches to get attention. It would be good to give these developers more attention to keep them more engaged.
pseudo code:
users_patches = get_patches_for_user( $username ) avg_time = 0; foreach( $patches as $patch ) { time = today - patch.created avg_time += today - patch.created } avg_time /= len( $patches )
echo $username + ': ' + days(avg_time)
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 6:44 AM, Brad Jorsch (Anomie) bjorsch@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 9:15 PM, Jeff Janes jeff.janes@gmail.com wrote:
I've noticed that when I submitted patches to review, it used to send out emails inviting people to review it. The last several patches I've submitted did not generates such emails (or at least if it did, I was not CC'ed on it).
The way the emails work is that people get added if the change matches the configurations at https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Git/Reviewers. If you don't happen to match anyone's rules, you won't get any reviewers automatically added.
When that happens, you could check https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Developers/Maintainers to see if anyone is listed for relevant components. It's also usually helpful to look through the git log for the code you're changing, pick out some similar changesets, and see who authored and reviewed them.
-- Brad Jorsch (Anomie) Software Engineer Wikimedia Foundation _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l