The Swedish Wikipedia now has more than 1.5 million articles, compared to 600,000 in January 2013 and 500,000 in September 2012. This is due to the creation by a bot of many articles on animal and plant species.
The Swedish Wikipedia community has discussed the matter thoroughly, and there is strong consensus to keep these articles and to keep on generating more. (It is known that many German wikipedians think these are bad articles that should be removed, but this is not their decision.)
The current implementation of [[Special:Random]], however, gives equal weight to every existing article and this is perceived as a problem that needs to be fixed.
But it is not obvious how a bug report or feature request should be written. A naive approach would be to ask for a random article that wasn't created by a bot, but this is not to the point. Users want bot generated articles to come up, only not so often. And some manually written article stubs are also less wanted. Perhaps the random function should be weighted by article length or by the number of page views? But is it practical to implement such a weighted random function? Are the necessary data in the database?