On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 9:00 PM, Robert Leverington robert@rhl.me.uk wrote:
On 2010-10-13, Trevor Parscal wrote:
Thank you, everyone, for responding so far (not trying to stop you here). Here's where it seems we're at.
1. Having an extension called "Vector" is neither descriptive or clear, and it is anticipated to cause confusion. 2. System administrators are not enjoying things being switched around on them, and would prefer the name either not change or for the extension to be merged into core. 3. 3 out of 5 code reviewers are voting that it should be merged into core (Brion and Tim have not weighed in yet).
I did not realise decisions were now being voted on by code reviewers, this is very concerning.
I think it's "pick on Trevor day" :-). Can we settle down and assume that he's saying that lots of people agree with it, and is using this as an example of the weight carried by some the people who are in agreement? Nobody has made any objection, so there is no indication whatsoever that "code reviewers" are overruling anybody else.