On Saturday 23 October 2004 01:39, Brion Vibber wrote:
This is true only to the limited extent that this code is not derived from and does not contain others' copyrighted code. You might find a few untainted lines here and there if you spend a long time looking.
Even if you dislike BSDL, you might want to consider LGPL which is a license published by FSF. I use opensource software in my site as revealed through this page: http://portal.wikinerds.org/thanks - I do support the opensource idea and ethics, it's just that in some cases some non-GPLable code cannot easily be combined with GPL. I think that's a common problem and I am sure many people would benefit from less restrictive MW licensing. You should certainly consider LGPL: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/lgpl.html