On 23 August 2013 16:25, Marc A. Pelletier marc@uberbox.org wrote:
On 08/23/2013 02:36 PM, Tyler Romeo wrote:
You mean like my $wgSecureGroups approach? Because if people actually
still
want that I can attempt to revive that part of my patch. I think it'd be
of
especial interest to require HTTPS for checkusers and oversight people,
due
to the legal problems associated with breaches to those accounts.
+1
I also see some value to this, and I speak as a member of both those groups. I'd like to see what can be developed, however, to support Checkusers/Oversighters/Stewards who have difficulty using HTTPS, and I have already initiated an offline discussion with Chris and others at the WMF about this.
Risker/Anne