On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Denny Vrandečić denny.vrandecic@wikimedia.de wrote:
That looks like a cool idea.
I am trying to experiment it on a few pages, and it seems to considerably reduce the number of web requests (for https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vincent_van_Gogh it goes from 120 to under 40 requests).
But the pages get quite bigger, obviously.
Which one is larger (given an empty cache)? One single big file containing the thumbnails or one small HTML file and individual thumbnail files (that includes possible overhead in the TCP/IP packages for both scenarios)?
Mathias