On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Brion Vibber bvibber@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hmm, IIRC using Hack means you can't use xdebug with Zend PHP ... is debugging with HHVM in PhpStorm possible yet/soon? (I just figured out the debugger setup with Zend PHP and MediaWiki-Vagrant, and it's wonderful to have a debugger in PHP :D )
-- brion
The xdebug remote debugging was unstable in 3.3, as of 3.4 it has now considered stable. I have not actually tried it myself though. It looks like the hhvm version we are packaging is 3.3.1, so in vagrant it will be a bit unstable atm.
Erk B.
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Chad innocentkiller@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri Jan 30 2015 at 10:04:39 AM Bryan Davis bd808@wikimedia.org
wrote:
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 7:18 AM, James Douglas <jdouglas@wikimedia.org
wrote:
I wonder whether Go's lack of parametric polymorphism might make it a pretty tough sell. Given the potential benefit of introducing a
statically
typed language, it might be interesting to investigate and compare
some
of
the different options.
Regarding Yuri's point about tools, what would it take to integrate
Hack
into the current MediaWiki build processes? It *seems* like it
wouldn't
be
a huge diversion, but I'm quite unfamiliar with what's in place now.
Have
we dabbled in Hack since the HHVM switch?
I'm not aware of any WMF/MediaWiki work being done in Hack yet. Putting Hack into MediaWiki's core would be controversial but a stand alone service/app could easily choose to use it I think.
Yeah, I'd -2 anything that required Hack in core.
However if an extension wants to experiment they probably could. I was already thinking of trying some Hack in something WMF-specific like a Wikimedia* extension.
-Chad _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l