On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 06:15:22 +0100 (CET), Lars Aronsson wrote:
Many articles contain complicated and advanced usages of HTML, and that seem to work out fine.
I don't think anybody is happy with the need for HTML markup in wiki pages.
Hello,
I personally like being able to code html in wikipedia articles. That's the frist descriptive langage I learned. I don't see why we should relearn a new langage (wiki) when there is already one working well.
I mean <b> to bold a text is not THAT difficult to learn :)
cheers,