On 6/23/06, Steve Bennett stevage@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for this explanation. I don't quite follow the logical step that was made between "one common and important use" and "the way this should work", but, hey. In practice, in Wikipedia, this "common and important" use is basically never used - we certainly don't want ASCII art in our articles.
True, in general. The *idea* was to make things a bit less confusing, which I think probably failed. YMMV.