Hoi, Now that ONLY indicates that stock agencies have a similar problem to Commons, it does not help finding images or indicates a path we could take to improve things.
When images are gaining tags as part of the Wikidatification of multi mediafiles we at least have a way to add multi lingual support and, that does improve things on what we have today. Thanks, GerardM
On 18 June 2014 03:46, Tim Starling tstarling@wikimedia.org wrote:
On 18/06/14 11:13, Lars Aronsson wrote:
Why is it still, now in 2014, so hard to find images? We have categories and descriptions, but we also know they don't describe all that we want to find in an image. If I need an image with a bicycle and some red flowers, I can only go to the category:bicycles and hope that I'm lucky when browsing through the first 700 images there. Most likely, the category will be subdivided by country or in some other useless way that will make my search harder.
Where is science? Google was created in 1998, based on its Pagerank algorithm for web pages filled with words and links. That was 14 years ago. But what algorithms are there for finding images?
How do the commercial stock agencies do it? They have a much more similar problem to Commons than Google does.
-- Tim Starling
Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l