On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Subramanya Sastry ssastry@wikimedia.org wrote:
On 07/23/2013 05:28 PM, John Vandenberg wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:06 AM, Subramanya Sastry ssastry@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hi John and Risker,
First off, I do want to once again clarify that my intention in the previous post was not to claim that VE/Parsoid is perfect. It was more that we've fixed sufficient bugs at this point that the most significant "bugs" (bugs, not missing features) that need fixing (and are being fixed) are those that have to do with usability tweaks.
How do you know that? Have you performed automated tests on all Wikipedia content? Or are you waiting for users to find these bugs?
http://parsoid.wmflabs.org:8001/stats
This is the url for our round trip testing on 160K pages (20K each from 8 wikipedias).
Fantastic! How frequently are those tests re-run? Could you add a last-run-date on that page?
Was a regression testsuite built using the issues encountered during the last parser rewrite?
-- John Vandenberg