On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 4:31 PM, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
On 13 June 2012 21:29, Chad innocentkiller@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 3:43 AM, Antoine Musso hashar+wmf@free.fr wrote:
Organizing a logo context, just like we did for the Wikipedia logo, is probably the best idea. Thanks Trevor for remembering us about it.
I think a contest may indeed be in order then :)
The key objection last time was that the current logo looks alive, all proposed replacements look dead. Just please note that for the contest ...
So we'll have some contingency in the rules saying "if they all suck, we'll just stick with the current one." Easy enough.
-Chad