Evan wrote: http://www.wikitravel.org/article/Wikitravel:Why_Wikitravel_isn%27t_GFDL
With the by-sa CC license, you have a copyright notice and the URL of the license. Baddabingbaddaboom.
We need a print-it-and-go-license; the GFDL is much more oriented to publishing bound books, where adding another 10 pages isn't really that important. I'm not sure I followed this part.
Well -- I kinda assumed that the GFDL was usable for all your needs -- It doesnt make sense that the full text of something GNU be reproduced -- It seems that Before you ever print anything -- you need content, and generally the go with what works-ness of the GNUFDL would usually work. Perhaps if you went with the FDL anyway (for starters), by the time you actually had enough material where someone wants to reproduce a flier from some of it, there will be some resolution to the license reproduction issue.
-S-
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com