-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Aryeh Gregor wrote:
Bureaucrats can also add people. I'm assuming that people who have had commit access for a reasonably long time and have shown they know how to use it should be marked coders, but I'm still really uncertain given that nobody's actually said what the various statuses are supposed to actually mean. Are people going to actually scap on the basis of nothing other than the fact that every commit is marked ok/resolved? If so, it's probably a bad idea for people other than Tim or Brion to add those markings, at least on a regular basis, unless we really want that.
The current theory is we'd like it to be easy to mark things as needing *more* review, but hard to mark things as needing *less* review.
So that probably means a split-level permissions model, perhaps with distinct pre-review and super-review (to use the Mozilla term -- patch reviews get "super-reviewed" by a core committer, or some such crazy thing).
It is, of course, an evolving system. :)
- -- brion