On 19.11.2011 18:15, Happy Melon wrote:
No, you can always create a new filename that will sort between two others without needing to rename either of the other two. And you can always change *a* filename without altering the sort order of the collection. So if you have a "000-default" file and then a set of "100-foo" files that must load after default (but it doesn't matter how they load amongst themselves), then another set of "200-foo" files that must load after the 100- files, you can always choose a name ("050-", "100-", "150-", "200-" or "250-") that will cause it to load at the time you need, without having to rename any other files. --HM_______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
I don't like that way. It's not aesthetically beautiful. It reminds me of ancient programming languages of early 80's. That is absolutely unnecessary complication of virtual hosts editing, comparing to cut / copy / paste in single file, when I don't need any ugly numerical prefixes at all. Dmitriy