On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 9:32 PM, Danny B. Wikipedia.Danny.B@email.cz wrote:
Not true. XHTML 1 was NOT violated.
I am not going to discuss this any further with you as long as you refuse to accept the fact that there is disagreement on this and that your interpretation is no more important than mine vis-a-vis MediaWiki. If you can't even agree to disagree, there's no point in my talking to you.
What you mean by "automatically added as part of the encoding process"? Does that mean that if I'll write [[#foo]] it will automatically create the #xfoo anchor?
No. If you write [[#foo]] it will create a #foo anchor. If you write #0 it will create a #x0 anchor. Try it out on trunk before you invent baseless objections.
2008/12/28 Danny B. Wikipedia.Danny.B@email.cz:
I really don't feel comfortable that instead of discussion you continue to push your like-to-be solution. :-(
That commit was not pushing anything. Brion set the status quo of names being copied to id's, and given that status quo, I only fixed it so that it didn't produce invalid XHTML, at Brion's suggestion. This is something that I had planned to do for a long time, independent of the current issue (i.e., even if anchors used only the name attribute).