On 23 March 2010 23:19, K. Peachey p858snake@yahoo.com.au wrote:
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Trevor Parscal tparscal@wikimedia.org wrote:
I think we should really consider LOLCODE for this sort of thing. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lolcode It's just more fun!
Also rewrite parser functions to use it? that would be interesting on en.wiki since they are always complaining about the syntax.
I can think of little more appropriate.
- d.