On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Rob Lanphier robla@wikimedia.org wrote:
...snip... This seems like a real problem. If Jack wants someone to review his code, should he simply move it back from "deferred" to "new"? What criteria are used to mark something as "deferred" in the first place? I'm assuming it's currently standard practice to mark extensions that aren't slated for deployment by WMF as "deferred"; do I have that right?
Rob
See http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Code_Review and http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Code_review_guide -Peachey