While what are we arguing then? I think i have lost track.
-- brian
On Wednesday, August 8, 2018, Ryan Kaldari rkaldari@wikimedia.org wrote:
It's possible to highlight abuses while still being respectful and collegial. No one is seriously arguing that criticism should be banned (or the word "fuck").
On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 3:50 PM MZMcBride z@mzmcbride.com wrote:
Ori Livneh wrote:
MZMcBride has a very good ear for grievances, and he knows how to use
his
considerable social clout to draw attention to them, and then use words as a kind of lightning-rod for stoking outrage and focusing it on particular targets.
I'm going to paraphrase what you're writing here: I spend some of my accumulated social capital calling out or highlighting abuses by and corruption within Wikimedia Foundation Inc. And you think that's _bad_?
MZMcBride
Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l