On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Mark Holmquist mtraceur@member.fsf.org wrote:
And I really don't like the idea of B. I can easily see people mentioning bugs that are related to a commit in the commit message but not directly fixed by it.
Maybe we should start a new branch per-bug instead, and merge the branch when the bug is fixed? That might help with this issue.
I don't really like that idea either. How about instead of auto-closing, we at least have Gerrit tell BZ a patch was committed/submitted? That would save the "I've put a patch in <url>" step, and would prompt people on the CC list to possibly close when Gerrit says "Patch <foo> was submitted." Gerrit could probably tweak the keywords as well.
-Chad