Which is exactly what my param means. Its expected that failures will be reported, and --with-known-to-fail would indicate that known failures will be added.
--knowntofail-to-fail and --ktf-to-fail certainly aren't any clearer.
-Chad
On Jul 22, 2009 7:22 PM, "dan nessett" dnessett@yahoo.com wrote:
If anyone can come up with a better option name, I would be happy to replace ktf-to-fail. I generally don't like cryptic abbreviations. However, "with-known-to-fail" doesn't really get at the underlying meaning of the option. It specifies that known-to-fail test results are accumulated as failures for the purpose of parserTest statistics.
--- On Wed, 7/22/09, Chad innocentkiller@gmail.com wrote:
From: Chad innocentkiller@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Wikitech-l] Known to fail interactions with compare and
record
To: "Wikimedia developers" wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org Date: Wednesday, July 22, 2009, 4:15 PM
Why not just call it > --with-known-to-fail? Easy. > > -Chad > > On Jul
22, 2009 7:11 PM, "dan n...
_______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikim...