On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 01:44:46PM +0100, Rob Church wrote:
On 17/06/06, Tomer Chachamu the.r3m0t@gmail.com wrote:
/me thought image deletions were permanent for disk-space reasons.
Why the hell does everybody seem to have thought that? There was never, as far as I am aware, any policy related to saving disk space that would cause that. It's simply that there was a lack of code until now. :)
Likely (puts helpdesk hat on) because they knew that that otherwise useful functionality wasn't provided, and in lieu of an *actual* reason why not, they modeled it in their head, and that's what they came up with.
Apply 'telephone' to the result; blather, wince, repeat.
Cheers, -- jra