On 11/10/07, Jay R. Ashworth jra@baylink.com wrote:
Not my point. You're discussing speed of cut, I'm discussing *target* of cut.
Eh? How can good syntax violate the principle of least surprise?
My assertion was that, for analytical purposes, if it was practical to run it, we could instrument the parser to log somewhere the count of constructs it parses on each page, which would save grinding the entire database to get the statistics of which I speak. The users would grin it for us.
Sounds good. Transclusion would alter your results, of course.
Steve