On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 5:19 AM, Brion Vibber brion@pobox.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Platonides Platonides@gmail.com wrote:
My concern are images inside articles, where a big screen user will want |500px but a small screen one |120px. Maybe we should move to a size specification dependant on the
clientWidth.
That's really a separate issue, which is that a large portion of image uses in content should probably be changed; trade hardcoded sizes for galleries and priority markers, perhaps. And of course replace the crappy old link-to-image-page with a sensible click-to-zoom.
I had once talked about this (click-to-zoom) feature on wikimedia sites in irc. Wikipedia could have something similar to sites like Facebook or Google+ where the images float over the page. I have tried an extension FancyBoxThumbshttp://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:FancyBoxThumbs which enables such a feature, with some enhancements it can be more awesome.