Also keep in mind that it is used by many people to track feature-requests (long and short-term, planned and wishlist), as well as bugs, so some growth is both inevitable and desired. (I believe this is what James is saying)
Much agreed. Phabricator is used to keep track of many other things besides bugs, in our team we keep our whole backlog there thus it is expected to grow at a much faster rate than a bug list would. A backlog is a repository of ideas and some of those are clearly defined tasks but not others.
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 1:02 AM, Nick Wilson (Quiddity) < nwilson@wikimedia.org> wrote:
On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Pine W wiki.pine@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Quim,
Thanks. Just wondering, do we have a graph somewhere that shows trends? There is quite a gap between tasks created and tasks closed, and if
that's
normal each month then there needs to be some thought about how to fix
the
gap, yes?
Thanks, Pine
Also keep in mind that it is used by many people to track feature-requests (long and short-term, planned and wishlist), as well as bugs, so some growth is both inevitable and desired. (I believe this is what James is saying). But I agree that an increase of old-bug triage and resolving, would be welcomed. _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l