David Gerard wrote:
I think you are completely and utterly wrong on this.
I think you didn't really read my posting properly, and you only posted this for the sake of appearing cleverer or having the last word.
As Jay already mentioned, we are actually agreeing with each other. I never said absolutely anything that would suggest that the wiki engine would "just spit back "INVALID CONTENT"". If you had thought about what you wrote instead of just blasting it out into the mailing list, you would have realised that browsers also don't "just spit back "INVALID CONTENT"", but this doesn't mean any conceivable sequence of characters is valid HTML.
Timwi