fde#@%62jtgjsl$#5kgsgjgseojgro@#$%SEGsgesjojahREAGHkerahj23YJ34pwyjw3$#^WrejgshSH
Time Required to Exhaustively Search this Password's Space:
Online Attack Scenario: 5.04 thousand trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion centuries Offline Fast Attack Scenario: 50.42 million trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion centuries Massive Cracking Array Scenario: 50.42 thousand trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion centuries
Now just remember that password.
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Martijn Hoekstra martijnhoekstra@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Gryllida gryllida@fastmail.fm wrote:
On Sun, 26 Jan 2014, at 0:02, rupert THURNER wrote:
for the password policy: display a strength indicator is great. anything more? i would say just leave it to the user.
rupert.
THANK YOU. My thoughts exactly. :-)
Everyone who has a thought should write it on-wiki for these people to hear you without manually scanning a mailing list. Thanks.
gry
I once saw a "can be brute forced on commodity hardware in x" field instead of an abstract "strength" field - but phrased less techy. I liked that.
Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l