Steve Bennett-4 wrote:
I'm curious what the intended uses of it are.
It being <onlyinclude>, the intended use is that you can write a page which is intended to be transcluded and demarcate those parts of the page which should appear, rather than those parts which should not.
This would make it simpler when adding further annotation, since it would not have to be labelled as such; when using <noinclude> you have to make sure you add extra text either inside the existing tags or inside new tags.
There is an existing item on BugZilla requesting that when viewing a template, those areas marked with <noinclude> or <onlyinclude> be given a CSS class to allow users to see them more clearly; I forget what the current state of that item is.
HTH HAND