Jürgen Herz wrote:
Adrian wrote:
Shouldn't it have been replaced the first time?
That was also my thought.
I guess they act according to the motto "One time is never, two times is always".
The first time they had the manufacturer running diagnostics on it and such. Apparently it failed a second time before they were able to get the replacement done. (Sure hope it's not part number AE-35...)
-- brion vibber (brion @ pobox.com)