Shinjiman wrote:
Oldak Quill <oldakquill@...> writes:
And why do we need both <noinclude> and <includeonly>? Do they not, when placed around slightly different sections of text, perform the same function?
But something interesting that is, any difference between <includeonly> and <onlyinclude>??
Yes, they do completely different things:
One of them makes the enclosed part only appear during a template inclusion. The other makes an inclusion include only that part.
The better question is, which one is which? :)
These are terribly named, but of course now we're stuck with them for compatibility. Remember this when you next add a feature...
-- brion vibber (brion @ pobox.com)