Op 8 apr 2011, om 01:11 heeft MZMcBride het volgende geschreven:
Krinkle wrote:
Op 5 apr 2011, om 10:31 heeft Bryan Tong Minh het volgende geschreven:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 4:41 AM, Daniel Friesen lists@nadir-seen-fire.com wrote:
Personally, I like tacking on ?action=edit and especially purge. Prefixing Special:Edit/ doesn't sound nice to me. I know I fixed the issues with things like Special:Movepage not sharing the same UI tabs as the rest of the actions.
I'm +1 with you on this. I don't have any convincing arguments against either way, but action links just look nicer to me.
Without a doubt I'm +1 on this as well (either one of the other).
I mostly agree with you, I think, but you seem to be side-stepping the linking issue. The fact that it's currently quite ugly to make an edit link or a protect link is one of the biggest arguments in favor of using Special pages.
Assuming all actions were standardized to use the ?action= parameter, what do you think about an {{#action:}} parser function? It would allow for something like [[{{#action:move|Main Page}}]]. Does this seem reasonable? If so, I think a page on MediaWiki with some transition information and a more in-depth look at what's actually needed to get to a consistent state would be a good next step (assuming such a page doesn't exist already). Thoughts?
MZMcBride
Indeed, the linking issue is one of the things action-parameters does not fix. But like you say, those could be solved in another way.
I like the {{#action}} idea. I'm not sure [[ and ]] can or should still be needed though.
-- Krinkle