On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Brian Wolff bawolff@gmail.com wrote:
Some people have claimed that CACHE_DB might even slow things down compared to CACHE_NONE when used as main cache type (cache db is still better than cache none for slow caches like the parser cache). Anyhow you should do profiling type things when messing with caching settings (or any performance settings) to see what is effective and what is not.
-bawolff
Wouldn't be surprised. ;) The only problem is that with CACHE_NONE, many things (specifically, throttling mechanisms) won't work since the cache isn't persistent across requests.
*-- * *Tyler Romeo* Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015 Major in Computer Science www.whizkidztech.com | tylerromeo@gmail.com