Brion Vibber schreef:
One thing to consider is that we could actually *indicate* those non-contiguous merged sections in some useful way, like a (shudder) tree view....... maybe.... sort of. :D
Everything gets horrifyingly ugly when you try to do anything other than straight timelines, though.
We could make merging histories a separate feature (as opposed to the move+undelete hack we use now) and let the user specify where to insert revisions. Right now they're just inserted chronologically, which might not always make sense. Of course this requires a lot of coding and schema changes and stuff, so we probably wanna put that off until after the 1.12 release (if we're even gonna do it in the first place).
Roan Kattouw (Catrope)
P.S.: About that, any idea when the 1.12 release will be, Brion?