On 14/11/2007, Jay R. Ashworth jra@baylink.com wrote:
Well, the fundamental point of these five threads was *there is no formal specification*. That means that any replacement has to *exactly match* the behaviour of the current code. If that's not what we want, then we need to decide on a specced behavior for wikitext, and we can't back one out of the current parser, since as you note, there are already corner cases.
We can iteratively approach it. "Here's 99%. What's the breakage level?" "This, this and this need to work." *fixfixfix*
- d.