On 17/10/10 13:34, Q wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
On 10/17/2010 5:40 AM, Robert Stojnic wrote:
I am sure google already taps into recent changes in wikipedia, but it might be worth contacting them officially to see if edits marked as vandalism can be threated with larger priority in their indexing process.
Cheers, Robert
And what qualifies as vandalism and who gets to decide that?
Good point, I think it also applies to the original blog post about marking pages to be refreshed. I guess the community will have to draft some kind of a proposal of what kind of edits can be marked for fast-track search engine refresh, probably in lines of what is thought of as obvious vandalism.
Cheers, r.