Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
A (good) argument can be made that you've mistakenly typed "useful" when you meant to type "dangerous", and that such work should be sanitized by something like a parser function.
Cheers, -- jra
Steve Bennet:
- The parser will be adapted to allow rendering a format other than
HTML, like PDF or something.
- The grammar will be altered to deny all HTML.
Those HTMLish tags are wikisyntax tags, and as such are bound to all restrictions of the rest of the parser.
I obviously said it doesn't need to be parsed thinking in a HTML parser. If you want to make a pdf parser before the html one it's up to you. We could send user pdfs instead of html...