On 30/12/11 08:30, Dan Collins wrote:
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Huib Laurens sterkebak@gmail.com wrote:
It doesn't need to be compatible or open-source right?
GPL 2.0 section 2 b:
b) You must cause any work that you distribute or publish, that in whole or in part contains or is derived from the Program or any part thereof, to be licensed as a whole at no charge to all third parties under the terms of this License.
You can modify GPL software for private use. That clause only kicks in when you "distribute or publish" the work, so you're generally OK if you're just using it within a single company. Maybe that's what Huib meant by "closed source".
-- Tim Starling