Angela a écrit:
On 7/31/05, Anthere anthere9@yahoo.com wrote:
You mean a bureaucrat can actually anytime directly take any existing account, move it to another account, and reattribute it to anyone else ?
[...]
Was each project informed on this ?
Wikipedia, Wiktionary, Wikibooks, and Wikinews were informed of it. Wikiquote and Wikisource don't have mailing lists, and I forgot about the Commons (sorry). The help pages about changing username were updated on meta, so hopefully even those not on mailing lists would have some knowledge about the feature. This is going on the assumption that members of those lists will translate the information there are disseminate that within their own language projects.
http://mail.wikipedia.org/pipermail/wikipedia-l/2005-July/040905.html
Do you know if some projects developped rules about such a feature use ?
I'm not aware of any such rules. On the English Wikipedia, it's currently a judgement call of the few bureaucrats who are doing this task. Until a problem arises, there isn't much call for a policy, which is probably why the Steward policies still had the "draft" tag on them until March of this year. :)
Angela.
Hmmm, it is good to know projects were informed. Though I was aware it was possible for bureaucrat to rename accounts, I thought the old account was not freed... I am not sure everyone realised. Well, if everyone is happy with this... good.
Concerning the CheckUser feature, when I tried to use it, I could not. Is it me not understanding how it works, or is it possibly not working right now ?
In any cases, should not we update entirely this portion of the privacy policy (http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Privacy_policy#Policy_on_release_of_data_deri...) to stick to new features and practices ? Or update practices to stick to policies ?
ant