Out of curiosity, has anyone experimented with configuring cacheing within apache itself?
http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/mod/mod_cache.html
It is my understanding that squid takes advantage the same pragma headers that mod cache can look at - I wonder if there is an intermediate configuration that can be tuned and recommended without having to install a separate proxy server.
mod_cache is something I plan to look at in conjunction with MW as soon as performance requirements demands it (and time permits ).
/Jonah
----- Original Message ----- From: "Nick Triantos" nick@triantos.com To: "Wikimedia developers" wikitech-l@wikimedia.org Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2005 5:48 PM Subject: Re: [Wikitech-l] performance
It's also certainly worth looking at installing Squid (http://www.squid-cache.org) if you haven't, yet. That made a huge difference on the MW install I've got on an intranet at work, and also reduced the memory footprint.
cheers, -Nick
Paul Youlten wrote:
did you try installing the PHP booster Turck MMCache? I'm not allowed to on my shared server - but it appears to give performance a big boost.
Paul ----- Original Message ----- From: "NSK" nsk2@wikinerds.org To: wikitech-l@Wikimedia.org Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2005 11:54 PM Subject: [Wikitech-l] performance
MediaWiki 1.3.9 and 1.4beta4 are very slow and uses too many CPU cycles and memory compared to other wikis. The database schema, as I see it, seems to be inefficient. Are there any changes planned for 1.4 final to increase performance?
-- NSK http://portal.wikinerds.org _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l