> From: Aaron Schulz<aschulz4587(a)gmail.com>
>
> Until what? A timestamp? That would be more complex and prone to over/under
> guessing the right delay (you don't know how long it will take to commit). I
> think deferred updates are much simpler as they will just happen when the
> request is nearly done, however long that takes.
The two systems could be merged by putting these updates in a local
queue, and adding them to the real jobqueue at the end of the request?
LW