Hey,
Does anybody know if there is a way to pass all arguments to a Scribunto
script? In other words, to have a template and to pass all template
arguments into the script invokation? And if there isn't a way to do this,
is it possible to develop a way to do so? Because that would make things a
lot easier for the Lua version of ArticleHistory I'm working on.
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
www.whizkidztech.com | tylerromeo(a)gmail.com
I would like to take this time to welcome you to our hiring process
and give you a brief synopsis of the position's benefits and requirements.
If you are taking a career break, are on a maternity leave,
recently retired or simply looking for some part-time job, this position is for you.
Occupation: Flexible schedule 2 to 8 hours per day. We can guarantee a minimum 20 hrs/week occupation
Salary: Starting salary is 2000 GBP per month plus commission, paid every month.
Business hours: 9:00 AM to 5:00 PM, MON-FRI, 9:00 AM to 1:00 PM SAT or part time (UK time).
Region: United Kingdom.
Please note that there are no startup fees or deposits to start working for us.
To request an application form, schedule your interview and receive more information about this position
please reply to Tommy(a)xpatjobsuk.com,with your personal identification number for this position IDNO: 3985
Hi everyone,
Our Analytics crew have worked out how to generate a graph that gives
us a view into our code review backlog:
http://gerrit-stats.wmflabs.org/graphs/mediawiki
The red line is roughly the equivalent of this search in the Gerrit search box:
is:open -CodeReview=+2 -CodeReview=+1 -CodeReview=-1 -CodeReview=-2
project:^mediawiki.*
...which, in English, means "everything in the mediawiki/* projects
that hasn't been marked with a positive or negative review yet, and
hasn't been merged or abandoned yet"
These numbers seem to be +/- 10 revisions, and not evenly off over the
history, so bear that in mind as you look at the numbers. In
particular, it seems to paint a slightly rosier picture for how we're
doing on keeping up with the backlog than we are.[2]
That said, we seem to be doing pretty good on keeping up - better than
I thought had you asked me before I had the graph staring me in the
face. We still have quite a backlog, but it appears to be shrinking
by a modest amount. Our peak backlog appears to be mid July. For
those of you that have been reviewing, thanks for keeping up!
As of this writing, there's 207 revisions that have neither positive
nor negative reviews associated with them. That's still seems like a
pretty big number. 30 of those are more than a month old, and some
date back to May.
How is the process working for everyone? Is stuff getting reviewed
quickly enough? How has it been for the reviewers out there?
Rob
[1] https://github.com/wikimedia/limn
[2] For those interested in the gory details. Unfortunately, it's not
a perfect history due to the way Gerrit stores the history of
approvals (or rather, the fact that Gerrit doesn't store the
"history", just the current approval state for any given patchset).
In addition to known discrepancies, there may well be other issues.
In tracking it over the past couple of days, it looks like the last
few days are slightly undercounted (relative to the historical
numbers), as they drift upward every day so. Everything prior to
August 12 is stable, though, so we seem to be getting *consistent*
numbers for everything before August 12 (though quite possibly
overcounted by 10-ish revisions). It also more-or-less lines up with
the few manual datapoints that I have.
This crossed my desk this morning, it is a long and detailed (and honest!)
account by an insider of Google's efforts to increase code quality and
product quality. I think it's relevant to what we're doing at WMF, and
what we might do in the future.
http://mike-bland.com/2012/07/10/test-mercenaries.html