Wikitech-l January 2011

wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org

94 participants
78 discussions

Re: [Wikitech-l] Missing Section Headings
by Brion Vibber 03 Jan '11

03 Jan '11

The fix is to stop using IE for Mac -- it's been unmaintained for almost a decade and is wildly broken in so many ways that it's pretty much useless for everyday web browsing. -- brion On Jan 3, 2011 9:58 AM, "Platonides" <Platonides(a)gmail.com> wrote:

4 4

ERR_INVALID_REQ when trying upload a file with API
by Jan Luca 03 Jan '11

03 Jan '11

Hi, when I try to upload a file with the API (Request: http://toolserver.org/~jan/files/APIUploadREQError.txt), I get the following error: Request: [unknown method] [no URL], from <my IP> via amssq35.esams.wikimedia.org (squid/2.7.STABLE7) to [unknown host] ([unknown]) Error: ERR_INVALID_REQ, errno [No Error] at Sun, 02 Jan 2011 09:43:01 GMT Can you help me? Best regards, Jan

2 2

en.wiki dump status
by John 03 Jan '11

03 Jan '11

according to http://dumps.wikimedia.org/backup-index.html the last dump was 2010-11-10 04:30:28 is that page broken or are dumps still halted?

1 0

WYSIWTF working demo
by Magnus Manske 02 Jan '11

02 Jan '11

Happy new year all! Let me welcome you to this historical year (10 years of Wikipedia! Wow!) with a working demo of WYSIWTF, a pure JavaScript attempt at (pseudo-) WYSIWYG wikipedia editing. For the impatient, add document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="http://toolserver.org/~magnus/wysiwtf/wysiwtf.js"><\/script>'); to your vector.js, force-reload, and try any article, User, or Wikipedia namespace page. Click the WYSIWTF tab, edit, and save (yes, it does save. You are responsible for cleaning up if you make a mess ;-) (I invite you to try my test article at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Magnus_Manske/test ) Now, this is not "real" WYSIWYG, but rather what I'd call "augmented wikitext". You still edit wikitext, but some elements (headings, links, images, and yes, template) are HTML-rendered for convenience. Large templates are collapsed into the template name; double-click it to show/hide the vast sea of parameters, which you then can edit like normal wikitext. Likewise, double-click links or images to get (currently quite limited) properties. For this to work, wikitext is parsed into "augmented wikitext", which is then edited, and rewritten to normal wikitext upon save. Therefore, you can still enter wikitext directly, and it will "just work" (TM), except it won't show directly in its rendered form in the editor. Likewise, lots of wikitext markup is currently not parsed into an augmented form; bold/italics, lists, and tables, among others, are left untouched. I can do only so much for a demo :-) The editor component is by far the weakest part of this demo. I looked at CKedit, but it seemed too much work to adapt it for a demo than to write my own editor, which I then did. To make my life easier, each wikitext character (!) is its own <span> element, which might tax your browser. Medium-sized articles work fine in Chrome on my MacBook Pro, but YMMV. You can click into the text to position the cursor, move it left and right with the cursor keys (not up or down!), type text, delete or backspace, and use Enter for new line. That's it. No text selection, not bold/italics buttons, no undo. All of which is entirely feasible, but too much work for this demo. Some things can't be done with the demo right now, such as changing a template name, or resizing an image. Again, no technical reason, just a man-hour one. You will certainly find many ways to break it, and instances where it fails (correctly discerning whether and image if local or from Commons is one). What I would like is some discussion about * if this approach (working pseudo-WYSIWYG instead of unattainable perfect WYSIWYG) is the way to go * if the code I wrote would be a suitable basis for a system we can throw at the general public * if anyone is willing to help me with that As always, my code is GPL, and I would be more than happy if, in the end, it would become "official" Foundation code, with staff that supports it. Well, I can dream... Cheers, Magnus

8 17

Backup / Mirror of wikipedia dumps
by Austin McChord 02 Jan '11

02 Jan '11

Hi, I run a Data Storage / Backup company and I recently posted to reddit (redd.it/eus9z) about the fact that we have extra bandwidth/storage available and wanted to use it to do something good for the internet as a whole. From there I was referred to this http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mirroring_Wikimedia_project_XML_dumps and I saw you had yet to find a partner. In looking at the requirements 10TB of storage and 200 megabit (!20Mb/s sustained) would be trivial for our company to provide and we would be happy to provide it as a service free for the community. Please let me know what the next steps are so we can talk about the technical requirements to get this in place. Regards, -Austin W. McChord CEO Datto Inc. Phone: 203-665-6423 Fax: 203-665-0391 Email: amcchord(a)dattobackup.com Web: www.dattobackup.com

2 1

Open Allure: Software for wiki-based text-to-speech (TTS)
by John Graves 02 Jan '11

02 Jan '11

As part of my PhD research, the Open Allure Dialog System project is developing software to play wiki-based text-to-speech (TTS) scripts to add voiceovers to wiki pages. The project currently has free Mac and Windows download versions and open source Python code available at http://openallureds.org English, Portuguese and Italian are currently supported. Here's a demo video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w_euNYfN9BY (3 minutes) If you are interested in this project, have any advice/suggestions or know of similar projects, please contact me. John Graves AUT University Auckland, New Zealand john.graves(a)aut.ac.nz John Graves john.graves(a)aut.ac.nz +64 21 213 8367 (mobile) http://bit.ly/JohnGravesLinkedIn

1 0

Compatibility
by Happy-melon 01 Jan '11

01 Jan '11

I've been skimming the archives looking for something unrelated, and noticed that we fairly regularly have threads about compatibility, specifically the use of function X or feature Y in PHP, CSS, skins, or whatever. I concluded that we don't really have one centralised place where we document the software we support. So in the spirit of documentation, I've created another page to complement the other half dozen which already discuss system requirements (:-D) at mw.org: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Compatibility which is distinct primarily in a) trying to record which versions *did* support software which we now say we don't support, and b) including browsers and css/js. I wanted to bring it to everyone's attention primarily to check that we're all agreed on the software we no longer support. In addition to PHP4, PHP5.3.1 and MySQL3, which have been unsupported for donkey's years, I've marked PHP5.0 as unsupported (per [1][2]), since 1.15; that's a pretty arbitrary version to choose, but I picked one with some overlap with PHP 5.3. I've also marked IE <6 as unsupported, as IIRC someone said that recently (:-D). Is that accurate? For the future, PHP5.1 has just seen in its fifth New Year. Dropping support there would allow us to use __tostring() magic on various objects, which could be useful in various places. Equally, the Wikimedia cluster has run MySQL 5 for over a year now [3], and it's approaching its eighth birthday; MySQL 4.0 and 4.1 are no longer maintained. Of course, we're not saying "right, we don't support X, let's go add fun things to make absolutely sure that it doesn't work"; once a product is unsupported, we allow incompatibilities to gradually creep in in the course of normal development. We're not going to go change the recentchanges table to use BITs just because we can; but we might use that type if we introduce *new* columns. Also interested in what people think about the CSS/JS/Text-only section. Is that a fair summary of our position? --HM [1] http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2009-June/043584.html [2] http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2010-October/049828.html [3] http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2009-December/046127.html

1 0

New committers
by Chad 01 Jan '11

01 Jan '11

Just added 3 new committers. Let's give them a warm welcome. Core & extensions: Zak Greant (zak) - WMF contractor, working on documentation Extensions only: Jason Giglio (gigs) - Working on GoogleNewsSiteMap Robert Scheiber (rscheiber) - General extension cleanup/fixes/etc -Chad

3 2

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

Wikitech-l January 2011