Hi all,
Tian-Jian "Barabbas" Jiang@Gmail wrote:
> It's a very simple heuristic and proved to be fast enough on single
> P4 2GHz
> machine with 2GB RAM, which served for a 3GB Lucene index file. Results
> returned within 1 sec, in average.
BTW, in case you are not satisfied with 1 sec, here's some reasonable
room to
improve:
1. My environment is, actually, lame. It is a Windows 2003 box without the
benefit of inode-alike file system for Lucene's index file format. The worse
thing is, due to the lack of storage space, some secondary index files may
be located on separated machines via SLOW Windows Network Disks.
2. There's no either pagination nor cache in my system.
I bet anyone who has a FreeBSD 6.1 server with nice pagination will get
much better performance than me. ;-)
Regards,
/Mike/