I don't aim to discuss which one is better CVS or wiki.
First of all, again I am not so sure developing in wiki
works. Some think it won't work and some (including me, only
me?) think it might.
But think of the reality. Don't we need better mechanism for
development? Wiki might not work I know that. But I am not
sure yet.
Why don't we try? Is there any technical trouble to publish
wikipedia software sourcecode? It seems to me that it is
possible to publish sourcecode and some sysops apply them
regularly. If it didn't yield good result, it doesn't hurt
anything anyway.
Oh, maybe am I only one who believes development in wiki
might work? If so, I should do that in my own.
>> Probably. If meta is the place only for those who are
>> interested in development and administration, I would
like
>> to participate in meta.
>
>The best place for discussion of development and
administration, the
>technical aspects, is right here on wikitech-l.
What about the rest of stuff? Like documentation, testing,
bug reports and so on. Sourceforge?
I understand CVS seems better than wiki. Does anyone give
the opinion that the bug reports system of sourceforge is
better than meta-wikipedia. If I remember, there is none. I
would like to move bug reports in sourceforge to meta-wiki
(gradually). Objections?
I probably am going to post more detailed documents to meta-
wikipedia. (and hopefully more people will help
documentation)
I know my proposal is not good enough, what else we can do
to encourage more people to partipicate development?