Though I’m not sure if it’d be right to take names here, but this is probably an opportunity to discuss about:
- if there is a need for consensus when a Wikimedia affiliate provides support to one person from another affiliate - if an affiliate provides support if they share it on wiki for transparency or not - Wikimania scholarship recipients generally create Learning Patterns and write reports. These are good practices in general but making it mandatory for the scholarship recipients brings out a really valuable pool of knowledge which otherwise might not be the case because of the post-Wikimania fatigue. There is a need for more clarity if non-Wikimania participants (individual/affiliate reps) who travel because of support from another affiliate should also produce the same - If an affiliate decides to provide support, should they announce publicly (on regional mailman lists and meta/village pumps) if there is any conflict. If there was a rationale that the former used to identify certain individuals, should they share that as well?
I think discussing these above would be useful in general.
Bodhi, didn’t want to steal your thunder but I think some of the general points (above) can be discussed which in someway would be useful for all such future supports.
Subhashish
Begin forwarded message:
From: Bodhisattwa Mandal bodhisattwa.rgkmc@gmail.com Date: July 27, 2018 at 12:32:20 PM GMT+5:30 To: wikimediaindia-l wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: [Wikimediaindia-l] Wikimania tour of Rahul Desmukh Reply-To: Wikimedia India Community list wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Hi,
WMIN chapter president Rahul Deshmukh attended Wikimania 2018 in Cape Town without being selected for any type of scholarship. My question is why was he sent to the conference depriving other community members from India who were in the waiting list.
He spoke in the informal chairpersons' meetup for few minutes. The meeting doesn't require president of the organization's presence, and already there were 2 EC member of WMIN present, who could have attended the meeting.
To me, this is utter misuse of power and abuse of donation money.
Thanks, Bodhisattwa _______________________________________________ Wikimediaindia-l mailing list Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from the list / change mailing preferences visit https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l
Hi Bodhisattewa, Please take into consideration that Rahul did more than speaking for a few minutes during the chairs' meeting in Cape Town. - He prepared a discussion note for this meeting about a sensitive topic. - Rahul and me had several discussions (per skype and in person) in the weeks preceding the actual meeting. - Rahul presented his ideas during the meeting and was actively engaged in the discussion. - And in the end he got some home work as well: enhancing his note with the outcomes of the discussion. The contribution of Rahul was much appreciated. Regards, Frans
*Frans Grijzenhout*, voorzitter / chair +31 6 5333 9499
While i don't know much about the specific circumstances, i agree in general that there are many more ways to make the most of Wikimania and to contribute than through speaking. One on one meetings and networking will rarely show up on a programme but are very valuable for affiliates. Especially when you hope to learn from and collaborate with other affiliates.
Lodewijk
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018, 13:21 Frans Grijzenhout frans@wikimedia.nl wrote:
Hi Bodhisattewa, Please take into consideration that Rahul did more than speaking for a few minutes during the chairs' meeting in Cape Town.
- He prepared a discussion note for this meeting about a sensitive topic.
- Rahul and me had several discussions (per skype and in person) in the
weeks preceding the actual meeting.
- Rahul presented his ideas during the meeting and was actively engaged in
the discussion.
- And in the end he got some home work as well: enhancing his note with
the outcomes of the discussion. The contribution of Rahul was much appreciated. Regards, Frans
*Frans Grijzenhout*, voorzitter / chair
+31 6 5333 9499
*Vereniging Wikimedia Nederland* Mariaplaats 3 - 3511 LH Utrecht Kamer van Koophandel 17189036 http://www.wikimedia.nl/
2018-07-30 15:51 GMT+02:00 Subhashish Panigrahi psubhashish@gmail.com:
Though I’m not sure if it’d be right to take names here, but this is probably an opportunity to discuss about:
- if there is a need for consensus when a Wikimedia affiliate provides
support to one person from another affiliate
- if an affiliate provides support if they share it on wiki for
transparency or not
- Wikimania scholarship recipients generally create Learning Patterns and
write reports. These are good practices in general but making it mandatory for the scholarship recipients brings out a really valuable pool of knowledge which otherwise might not be the case because of the post-Wikimania fatigue. There is a need for more clarity if non-Wikimania participants (individual/affiliate reps) who travel because of support from another affiliate should also produce the same
- If an affiliate decides to provide support, should they announce
publicly (on regional mailman lists and meta/village pumps) if there is any conflict. If there was a rationale that the former used to identify certain individuals, should they share that as well?
I think discussing these above would be useful in general.
Bodhi, didn’t want to steal your thunder but I think some of the general points (above) can be discussed which in someway would be useful for all such future supports.
Subhashish
Begin forwarded message:
*From:* Bodhisattwa Mandal bodhisattwa.rgkmc@gmail.com *Date:* July 27, 2018 at 12:32:20 PM GMT+5:30 *To:* wikimediaindia-l wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org *Subject:* *[Wikimediaindia-l] Wikimania tour of Rahul Desmukh* *Reply-To:* Wikimedia India Community list < wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org>
Hi,
WMIN chapter president Rahul Deshmukh attended Wikimania 2018 in Cape Town without being selected for any type of scholarship. My question is why was he sent to the conference depriving other community members from India who were in the waiting list.
He spoke in the informal chairpersons' meetup for few minutes. The meeting doesn't require president of the organization's presence, and already there were 2 EC member of WMIN present, who could have attended the meeting.
To me, this is utter misuse of power and abuse of donation money.
Thanks, Bodhisattwa
Wikimediaindia-l mailing list Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from the list / change mailing preferences visit https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l
Wikimania-l mailing list Wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l
Wikimania-l mailing list Wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l
This is an issue of internal governance and management. Rahul is a member of the Executive Committee of Wikimedia India which constitutes six other members who are collectively responsible for decision-making in the best interests of the organization, as well as maintaining certain standards of accountability and transparency. Has there been an attempt to bring this to the attention of Rahul and the WMIN Executive Committee first?
That being said, I recall having a very productive meeting with Rahul at Wikimania, who gave me a thorough appraisal of the current status of Wikimedia India, recognizing that I am one of the founding members. My impression is that Rahul also effectively acted as the ambassador for Wikimedia India in several discussions, as other participants can also probably attest. Personally, I appreciate his enthusiasm and efforts towards keeping WMIN relevant in the broader Wikimedia movement.
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 8:52 PM Subhashish Panigrahi psubhashish@gmail.com wrote:
Though I’m not sure if it’d be right to take names here, but this is probably an opportunity to discuss about:
- if there is a need for consensus when a Wikimedia affiliate provides
support to one person from another affiliate
- if an affiliate provides support if they share it on wiki for
transparency or not
- Wikimania scholarship recipients generally create Learning Patterns and
write reports. These are good practices in general but making it mandatory for the scholarship recipients brings out a really valuable pool of knowledge which otherwise might not be the case because of the post-Wikimania fatigue. There is a need for more clarity if non-Wikimania participants (individual/affiliate reps) who travel because of support from another affiliate should also produce the same
- If an affiliate decides to provide support, should they announce
publicly (on regional mailman lists and meta/village pumps) if there is any conflict. If there was a rationale that the former used to identify certain individuals, should they share that as well?
I think discussing these above would be useful in general.
Bodhi, didn’t want to steal your thunder but I think some of the general points (above) can be discussed which in someway would be useful for all such future supports.
Subhashish
Begin forwarded message:
*From:* Bodhisattwa Mandal bodhisattwa.rgkmc@gmail.com *Date:* July 27, 2018 at 12:32:20 PM GMT+5:30 *To:* wikimediaindia-l wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org *Subject:* *[Wikimediaindia-l] Wikimania tour of Rahul Desmukh* *Reply-To:* Wikimedia India Community list < wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org>
Hi,
WMIN chapter president Rahul Deshmukh attended Wikimania 2018 in Cape Town without being selected for any type of scholarship. My question is why was he sent to the conference depriving other community members from India who were in the waiting list.
He spoke in the informal chairpersons' meetup for few minutes. The meeting doesn't require president of the organization's presence, and already there were 2 EC member of WMIN present, who could have attended the meeting.
To me, this is utter misuse of power and abuse of donation money.
Thanks, Bodhisattwa
Wikimediaindia-l mailing list Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from the list / change mailing preferences visit https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l
Wikimania-l mailing list Wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l
Hi,
My question was not whether, the presence of Rahul was useful or not in the Wikimania. My question was, why he was allowed to attend Wikimania depriving other Wikimedians who were in the waiting list of scholarship recipients in India, as the scholarship was said to be given to those who were in the waiting list from India. Where was the documentation or transparency? Even the WMIN EC members didn't knew about his tour. I question about the validity of his selection over other Wikimedians from scholarship waiting list.
Secondly, I posted the question in India mailing list, not here, because some Indian Wikimedians are familiar with what's going on, has insight about the matter. It would not be possible for others to understand the scenario without knowing the perspective. So, I request to comment in India mailing list and not here. Like other Indian Wikimedians attending the conference, I heard many things which question if WMIN should get any future support of volunteer community members of India or not, but that also, I don't intend to discuss in this mailing list. I hope, someone will definitely raise them in India mailing list soon.
So, let's start our discussion here what Subhashis wants to discuss in general. For specific discussions related to WMIN and Rahul, the India mailing list is open.
Thanks, Bodhisattwa
On Wed, 1 Aug 2018, 11:28 Anirudh S. Bhati, anirudhsbh@gmail.com wrote:
This is an issue of internal governance and management. Rahul is a member of the Executive Committee of Wikimedia India which constitutes six other members who are collectively responsible for decision-making in the best interests of the organization, as well as maintaining certain standards of accountability and transparency. Has there been an attempt to bring this to the attention of Rahul and the WMIN Executive Committee first?
That being said, I recall having a very productive meeting with Rahul at Wikimania, who gave me a thorough appraisal of the current status of Wikimedia India, recognizing that I am one of the founding members. My impression is that Rahul also effectively acted as the ambassador for Wikimedia India in several discussions, as other participants can also probably attest. Personally, I appreciate his enthusiasm and efforts towards keeping WMIN relevant in the broader Wikimedia movement.
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 8:52 PM Subhashish Panigrahi < psubhashish@gmail.com> wrote:
Though I’m not sure if it’d be right to take names here, but this is probably an opportunity to discuss about:
- if there is a need for consensus when a Wikimedia affiliate provides
support to one person from another affiliate
- if an affiliate provides support if they share it on wiki for
transparency or not
- Wikimania scholarship recipients generally create Learning Patterns and
write reports. These are good practices in general but making it mandatory for the scholarship recipients brings out a really valuable pool of knowledge which otherwise might not be the case because of the post-Wikimania fatigue. There is a need for more clarity if non-Wikimania participants (individual/affiliate reps) who travel because of support from another affiliate should also produce the same
- If an affiliate decides to provide support, should they announce
publicly (on regional mailman lists and meta/village pumps) if there is any conflict. If there was a rationale that the former used to identify certain individuals, should they share that as well?
I think discussing these above would be useful in general.
Bodhi, didn’t want to steal your thunder but I think some of the general points (above) can be discussed which in someway would be useful for all such future supports.
Subhashish
Begin forwarded message:
*From:* Bodhisattwa Mandal bodhisattwa.rgkmc@gmail.com *Date:* July 27, 2018 at 12:32:20 PM GMT+5:30 *To:* wikimediaindia-l wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org *Subject:* *[Wikimediaindia-l] Wikimania tour of Rahul Desmukh* *Reply-To:* Wikimedia India Community list < wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org>
Hi,
WMIN chapter president Rahul Deshmukh attended Wikimania 2018 in Cape Town without being selected for any type of scholarship. My question is why was he sent to the conference depriving other community members from India who were in the waiting list.
He spoke in the informal chairpersons' meetup for few minutes. The meeting doesn't require president of the organization's presence, and already there were 2 EC member of WMIN present, who could have attended the meeting.
To me, this is utter misuse of power and abuse of donation money.
Thanks, Bodhisattwa
Wikimediaindia-l mailing list Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from the list / change mailing preferences visit https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l
Wikimania-l mailing list Wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l
Wikimania-l mailing list Wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l
Any person not specifically banned from attendance is “allowed” to attend Wikimania. Do you have evidence that he was awarded a scholarship from WMF? If not, I don’t understand what this is about.
Cheers,
Peter Southwood
From: Wikimania-l [mailto:wikimania-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Bodhisattwa Mandal Sent: 01 August 2018 08:36 To: Wikimania general list (open subscription) Subject: Re: [Wikimania-l] Non-scholarship Wikimania support by Wikimedia affiliates (was earlier posted on [Wikimediaindia-l] list)
Hi,
My question was not whether, the presence of Rahul was useful or not in the Wikimania. My question was, why he was allowed to attend Wikimania depriving other Wikimedians who were in the waiting list of scholarship recipients in India, as the scholarship was said to be given to those who were in the waiting list from India. Where was the documentation or transparency? Even the WMIN EC members didn't knew about his tour. I question about the validity of his selection over other Wikimedians from scholarship waiting list.
Secondly, I posted the question in India mailing list, not here, because some Indian Wikimedians are familiar with what's going on, has insight about the matter. It would not be possible for others to understand the scenario without knowing the perspective. So, I request to comment in India mailing list and not here. Like other Indian Wikimedians attending the conference, I heard many things which question if WMIN should get any future support of volunteer community members of India or not, but that also, I don't intend to discuss in this mailing list. I hope, someone will definitely raise them in India mailing list soon.
So, let's start our discussion here what Subhashis wants to discuss in general. For specific discussions related to WMIN and Rahul, the India mailing list is open.
Thanks,
Bodhisattwa
On Wed, 1 Aug 2018, 11:28 Anirudh S. Bhati, anirudhsbh@gmail.com wrote:
This is an issue of internal governance and management. Rahul is a member of the Executive Committee of Wikimedia India which constitutes six other members who are collectively responsible for decision-making in the best interests of the organization, as well as maintaining certain standards of accountability and transparency. Has there been an attempt to bring this to the attention of Rahul and the WMIN Executive Committee first?
That being said, I recall having a very productive meeting with Rahul at Wikimania, who gave me a thorough appraisal of the current status of Wikimedia India, recognizing that I am one of the founding members. My impression is that Rahul also effectively acted as the ambassador for Wikimedia India in several discussions, as other participants can also probably attest. Personally, I appreciate his enthusiasm and efforts towards keeping WMIN relevant in the broader Wikimedia movement.
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 8:52 PM Subhashish Panigrahi psubhashish@gmail.com wrote:
Though I’m not sure if it’d be right to take names here, but this is probably an opportunity to discuss about:
- if there is a need for consensus when a Wikimedia affiliate provides support to one person from another affiliate
- if an affiliate provides support if they share it on wiki for transparency or not
- Wikimania scholarship recipients generally create Learning Patterns and write reports. These are good practices in general but making it mandatory for the scholarship recipients brings out a really valuable pool of knowledge which otherwise might not be the case because of the post-Wikimania fatigue. There is a need for more clarity if non-Wikimania participants (individual/affiliate reps) who travel because of support from another affiliate should also produce the same
- If an affiliate decides to provide support, should they announce publicly (on regional mailman lists and meta/village pumps) if there is any conflict. If there was a rationale that the former used to identify certain individuals, should they share that as well?
I think discussing these above would be useful in general.
Bodhi, didn’t want to steal your thunder but I think some of the general points (above) can be discussed which in someway would be useful for all such future supports.
Subhashish
Begin forwarded message:
From: Bodhisattwa Mandal bodhisattwa.rgkmc@gmail.com Date: July 27, 2018 at 12:32:20 PM GMT+5:30 To: wikimediaindia-l wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: [Wikimediaindia-l] Wikimania tour of Rahul Desmukh Reply-To: Wikimedia India Community list wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Hi,
WMIN chapter president Rahul Deshmukh attended Wikimania 2018 in Cape Town without being selected for any type of scholarship. My question is why was he sent to the conference depriving other community members from India who were in the waiting list.
He spoke in the informal chairpersons' meetup for few minutes. The meeting doesn't require president of the organization's presence, and already there were 2 EC member of WMIN present, who could have attended the meeting.
To me, this is utter misuse of power and abuse of donation money.
Thanks,
Bodhisattwa
_______________________________________________ Wikimediaindia-l mailing list Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from the list / change mailing preferences visit https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l
_______________________________________________ Wikimania-l mailing list Wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l
_______________________________________________ Wikimania-l mailing list Wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l
http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient Image removed by sender.
Virus-free. http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient www.avg.com
Rahul was not a WMF scholarship recipient, he was sent by affiliate organization CIS -A2K, which declared that they will send first 3 Wikimedians from India who were in the waiting list of WMF scholarship recipient list, 2 of them declined to attend the conference. Instead of arranging for the next person in the waiting list to attend the conference, Rahul was sent without any transparency or documentation.
I repeat, this specific topic is not suitable for this mailing list as many will not understand the perspective and community dynamics in India, and thus the question was asked in India mailing list. I hope, further discussions in this mailing list will be confined to the general questions asked by Subhashis.
Regards, Bodhisattwa
On Wed, 1 Aug 2018, 12:25 Peter Southwood, peter.southwood@telkomsa.net wrote:
Any person not specifically banned from attendance is “allowed” to attend Wikimania. Do you have evidence that he was awarded a scholarship from WMF? If not, I don’t understand what this is about.
Cheers,
Peter Southwood
*From:* Wikimania-l [mailto:wikimania-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] *On Behalf Of *Bodhisattwa Mandal *Sent:* 01 August 2018 08:36 *To:* Wikimania general list (open subscription) *Subject:* Re: [Wikimania-l] Non-scholarship Wikimania support by Wikimedia affiliates (was earlier posted on [Wikimediaindia-l] list)
Hi,
My question was not whether, the presence of Rahul was useful or not in the Wikimania. My question was, why he was allowed to attend Wikimania depriving other Wikimedians who were in the waiting list of scholarship recipients in India, as the scholarship was said to be given to those who were in the waiting list from India. Where was the documentation or transparency? Even the WMIN EC members didn't knew about his tour. I question about the validity of his selection over other Wikimedians from scholarship waiting list.
Secondly, I posted the question in India mailing list, not here, because some Indian Wikimedians are familiar with what's going on, has insight about the matter. It would not be possible for others to understand the scenario without knowing the perspective. So, I request to comment in India mailing list and not here. Like other Indian Wikimedians attending the conference, I heard many things which question if WMIN should get any future support of volunteer community members of India or not, but that also, I don't intend to discuss in this mailing list. I hope, someone will definitely raise them in India mailing list soon.
So, let's start our discussion here what Subhashis wants to discuss in general. For specific discussions related to WMIN and Rahul, the India mailing list is open.
Thanks,
Bodhisattwa
On Wed, 1 Aug 2018, 11:28 Anirudh S. Bhati, anirudhsbh@gmail.com wrote:
This is an issue of internal governance and management. Rahul is a member of the Executive Committee of Wikimedia India which constitutes six other members who are collectively responsible for decision-making in the best interests of the organization, as well as maintaining certain standards of accountability and transparency. Has there been an attempt to bring this to the attention of Rahul and the WMIN Executive Committee first?
That being said, I recall having a very productive meeting with Rahul at Wikimania, who gave me a thorough appraisal of the current status of Wikimedia India, recognizing that I am one of the founding members. My impression is that Rahul also effectively acted as the ambassador for Wikimedia India in several discussions, as other participants can also probably attest. Personally, I appreciate his enthusiasm and efforts towards keeping WMIN relevant in the broader Wikimedia movement.
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 8:52 PM Subhashish Panigrahi < psubhashish@gmail.com> wrote:
Though I’m not sure if it’d be right to take names here, but this is probably an opportunity to discuss about:
- if there is a need for consensus when a Wikimedia affiliate provides
support to one person from another affiliate
- if an affiliate provides support if they share it on wiki for
transparency or not
- Wikimania scholarship recipients generally create Learning Patterns and
write reports. These are good practices in general but making it mandatory for the scholarship recipients brings out a really valuable pool of knowledge which otherwise might not be the case because of the post-Wikimania fatigue. There is a need for more clarity if non-Wikimania participants (individual/affiliate reps) who travel because of support from another affiliate should also produce the same
- If an affiliate decides to provide support, should they announce
publicly (on regional mailman lists and meta/village pumps) if there is any conflict. If there was a rationale that the former used to identify certain individuals, should they share that as well?
I think discussing these above would be useful in general.
Bodhi, didn’t want to steal your thunder but I think some of the general points (above) can be discussed which in someway would be useful for all such future supports.
Subhashish
Begin forwarded message:
*From:* Bodhisattwa Mandal bodhisattwa.rgkmc@gmail.com *Date:* July 27, 2018 at 12:32:20 PM GMT+5:30 *To:* wikimediaindia-l wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org *Subject:* *[Wikimediaindia-l] Wikimania tour of Rahul Desmukh* *Reply-To:* Wikimedia India Community list < wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org>
Hi,
WMIN chapter president Rahul Deshmukh attended Wikimania 2018 in Cape Town without being selected for any type of scholarship. My question is why was he sent to the conference depriving other community members from India who were in the waiting list.
He spoke in the informal chairpersons' meetup for few minutes. The meeting doesn't require president of the organization's presence, and already there were 2 EC member of WMIN present, who could have attended the meeting.
To me, this is utter misuse of power and abuse of donation money.
Thanks,
Bodhisattwa
Wikimediaindia-l mailing list Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from the list / change mailing preferences visit https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l
Wikimania-l mailing list Wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l
Wikimania-l mailing list Wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l
[image: Image removed by sender.] http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient
Virus-free. www.avg.com http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient
Wikimania-l mailing list Wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l
That, as you say, is a different matter, and is probably not relevant to this list.
Thanks for clarifying
Cheers,
Peter Southwood
From: Wikimania-l [mailto:wikimania-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Bodhisattwa Mandal Sent: 01 August 2018 09:10 To: Wikimania general list (open subscription) Subject: Re: [Wikimania-l] Non-scholarship Wikimania support by Wikimedia affiliates (was earlier posted on [Wikimediaindia-l] list)
Rahul was not a WMF scholarship recipient, he was sent by affiliate organization CIS -A2K, which declared that they will send first 3 Wikimedians from India who were in the waiting list of WMF scholarship recipient list, 2 of them declined to attend the conference. Instead of arranging for the next person in the waiting list to attend the conference, Rahul was sent without any transparency or documentation.
I repeat, this specific topic is not suitable for this mailing list as many will not understand the perspective and community dynamics in India, and thus the question was asked in India mailing list. I hope, further discussions in this mailing list will be confined to the general questions asked by Subhashis.
Regards,
Bodhisattwa
On Wed, 1 Aug 2018, 12:25 Peter Southwood, peter.southwood@telkomsa.net wrote:
Any person not specifically banned from attendance is “allowed” to attend Wikimania. Do you have evidence that he was awarded a scholarship from WMF? If not, I don’t understand what this is about.
Cheers,
Peter Southwood
From: Wikimania-l [mailto:wikimania-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Bodhisattwa Mandal Sent: 01 August 2018 08:36 To: Wikimania general list (open subscription) Subject: Re: [Wikimania-l] Non-scholarship Wikimania support by Wikimedia affiliates (was earlier posted on [Wikimediaindia-l] list)
Hi,
My question was not whether, the presence of Rahul was useful or not in the Wikimania. My question was, why he was allowed to attend Wikimania depriving other Wikimedians who were in the waiting list of scholarship recipients in India, as the scholarship was said to be given to those who were in the waiting list from India. Where was the documentation or transparency? Even the WMIN EC members didn't knew about his tour. I question about the validity of his selection over other Wikimedians from scholarship waiting list.
Secondly, I posted the question in India mailing list, not here, because some Indian Wikimedians are familiar with what's going on, has insight about the matter. It would not be possible for others to understand the scenario without knowing the perspective. So, I request to comment in India mailing list and not here. Like other Indian Wikimedians attending the conference, I heard many things which question if WMIN should get any future support of volunteer community members of India or not, but that also, I don't intend to discuss in this mailing list. I hope, someone will definitely raise them in India mailing list soon.
So, let's start our discussion here what Subhashis wants to discuss in general. For specific discussions related to WMIN and Rahul, the India mailing list is open.
Thanks,
Bodhisattwa
On Wed, 1 Aug 2018, 11:28 Anirudh S. Bhati, anirudhsbh@gmail.com wrote:
This is an issue of internal governance and management. Rahul is a member of the Executive Committee of Wikimedia India which constitutes six other members who are collectively responsible for decision-making in the best interests of the organization, as well as maintaining certain standards of accountability and transparency. Has there been an attempt to bring this to the attention of Rahul and the WMIN Executive Committee first?
That being said, I recall having a very productive meeting with Rahul at Wikimania, who gave me a thorough appraisal of the current status of Wikimedia India, recognizing that I am one of the founding members. My impression is that Rahul also effectively acted as the ambassador for Wikimedia India in several discussions, as other participants can also probably attest. Personally, I appreciate his enthusiasm and efforts towards keeping WMIN relevant in the broader Wikimedia movement.
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 8:52 PM Subhashish Panigrahi psubhashish@gmail.com wrote:
Though I’m not sure if it’d be right to take names here, but this is probably an opportunity to discuss about:
- if there is a need for consensus when a Wikimedia affiliate provides support to one person from another affiliate
- if an affiliate provides support if they share it on wiki for transparency or not
- Wikimania scholarship recipients generally create Learning Patterns and write reports. These are good practices in general but making it mandatory for the scholarship recipients brings out a really valuable pool of knowledge which otherwise might not be the case because of the post-Wikimania fatigue. There is a need for more clarity if non-Wikimania participants (individual/affiliate reps) who travel because of support from another affiliate should also produce the same
- If an affiliate decides to provide support, should they announce publicly (on regional mailman lists and meta/village pumps) if there is any conflict. If there was a rationale that the former used to identify certain individuals, should they share that as well?
I think discussing these above would be useful in general.
Bodhi, didn’t want to steal your thunder but I think some of the general points (above) can be discussed which in someway would be useful for all such future supports.
Subhashish
Begin forwarded message:
From: Bodhisattwa Mandal bodhisattwa.rgkmc@gmail.com Date: July 27, 2018 at 12:32:20 PM GMT+5:30 To: wikimediaindia-l wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: [Wikimediaindia-l] Wikimania tour of Rahul Desmukh Reply-To: Wikimedia India Community list wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Hi,
WMIN chapter president Rahul Deshmukh attended Wikimania 2018 in Cape Town without being selected for any type of scholarship. My question is why was he sent to the conference depriving other community members from India who were in the waiting list.
He spoke in the informal chairpersons' meetup for few minutes. The meeting doesn't require president of the organization's presence, and already there were 2 EC member of WMIN present, who could have attended the meeting.
To me, this is utter misuse of power and abuse of donation money.
Thanks,
Bodhisattwa
_______________________________________________ Wikimediaindia-l mailing list Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from the list / change mailing preferences visit https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l
_______________________________________________ Wikimania-l mailing list Wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l
_______________________________________________ Wikimania-l mailing list Wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l
http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient Image removed by sender.
Virus-free. http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient www.avg.com
_______________________________________________ Wikimania-l mailing list Wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l
wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org
