Hi Mina,
I am sorry, but what gender transition of minors and Covid-19 lockdowns have to do with Wikimania?
I don't have problems with people with alt-right views attending Wikimania. I have a problem when a discussion of safety at Wikimania turns into a discussion about gender transition of minors and Covid-19 lockdowns (both are extremely unlikely to happen at Wikimania in Singapore but are very popular discussion topics within alt-right groups).
The truth is that bathroom harassment comes way more often not from the fact that trans people can go to bathrooms matching their identities, but from people who decide to control strangers' gender in bathrooms : https://www.vox.com/2016/5/18/11690234/women-bathrooms-harassment
If the problem is harassment, then it should not be tolerated no matter the gender in your passport. And I very much hope nobody will have to show their passport to access a bathroom because it will just make everybody unsafe.
Mykola (NickK)
29 червня 2023, 10:22:35, від "Mina Theofilatou" < saintfevrier@gmail.com >:
Hi Lodewijk and Claudia and thanks for your replies.
Apologies if I used the wrong word in my original email: I agree with you that the situations I am describing are not harassment per se, so I used the word "discomfort" in the description of what I meant. Sincere apologies to any list members who may feel offended, that was not my intention. I was merely relaying the concerns of my friend, to the extent that they sounded reasonable to me.
As for your further comments, which go so far as to name me "transphobic", well that is one of the reasons I have distanced myself from the Wikimedia Movement at this stage. I had distanced myself in the past too, after an incident at Wikimania in 2016 which caused me severe discomfort (seems that "harassment" is a sensitive word so I will avoid it, even though it was acknowledged by T&S that it was indeed that. I got an apologetic email in private, even though I had specifically requested that any communication be public as was the incident. Z, if you're reading, I'm all for public communication when the issues being discussed have been initiated in public. To cut a long story short, I'm certain that the "Code of Conduct" and "friendly space policy" guidelines would command that shouting at and intimidating a fellow Wikipedian in a public space in the presence of many Wikipedians and a T&S staff member is not acceptable. Noone stepped in to stop the offender on the spot, not even the T&S employee: they just watched while I was being shouted at. I made a complaint and after months of investigation I managed to elicit a response from the "investigating" team. I had no choice but to make it public so I uploaded a screenshot of the email to Commons. I've linked to the screenshot below to help you understand what I am talking about, and why I have little confidence in Trust and Safety). I gradually gained back my confidence in the movement and participated for another four years, i.e. 2017-2021, but when I realised in 2022 that NPOV has gone totally out the window I'm through with the Movement.
Back to the "transphobic" name-calling: it seems that anyone who expresses the slightest concern about gender policies is easily branded as transphobic. Some even go so far as to brand them as "alt right". Blaire White, an extremely attractive and happy trans woman who is calling out the pressure being exerted on minors to transition at ages when the brain is still developing, is "transphobic". Scott Newgent is "transphobic". "What is a Woman '' is a documentary for "transphobics". Johanna Olson-Kennedy, who publicly addressed parents at a conference saying that "the good thing about double mastectomies is that if the girl regrets at a later point in her life, she can go ahead and get breasts" is a "hero". Why am I going into such detail? Well because two of the participants in this list encouraged me to write an article on Wikipedia about it. Have you any idea how difficult it is to express so much as an inkling of "the other side of the story" to a "contentious topic"? But isn't that what NPOV is supposed to be about? Any attempts I have made to add this simple sentence in a neutral manner with a reliable source to Johanna Olson-Kennedy's article was met with rapid reverts and even a deletion discussion. The result was "keep", but do you really think I am willing to expend more time and energy on edit-warring over edits that used to be perfectly acceptable? Same for my efforts on John Ioannidis's page: one of the most highly cited researchers in the world is being blatantly slandered for his objections to lockdowns during the Covid-19 crisis. By whom? By a certain globally unimportant doctor who goes by the name of David Gorski. Ever heard of him? Oh, but on Wikipedia his blog "Science Based Medicine" seems to be the epitome of reliability in anything from Covid to transgender procedures on underage girls.
I look at the history of articles. I also look at discussion pages, and quite frankly these are currently the most effective ways of obtaining reliable information on Wikipedia. So in one such session, when I looked at the history of "John Ioannidis" and noticed that I was not the only one trying to "inject" some NPOV into the Covid-19 paragraph of the article, I checked the contribs of the other editor and saw that he had edited the page "Irreversible Damage". That's how I learned about that book, which I ordered and read, along with TRANS by Helen Joyce (a notable author with an article on Wikipedia). Interestingly, Gorski was involved in this issue too: one of the co-founders of SBM had written a positive review for "Irreversible Damage: the Transgender Craze Seducing our Daughters", and the review remained on the website for seven months. Then, after seven months the article was taken down and a slandering ensued. Are we supposed to believe that the science behind the book changed 180 degrees in seven months?
Returning to the original issue, hmm. If everyone at Wikimania is so quick to be offended by the slightest concern about gender policies, then perhaps it's better if we """transphobic"""", """"conservative"""", """"alt-right""" folks (lots of quotation marks) simply not attend? I will relay this to my friend. It has been an enlightening discussion, thank you.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/02/Resolution_for_report_of...
Χωρίς ιούς.www.avast.com
On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 1:39 AM effe iets anders effeietsanders@gmail.com wrote: Hi Mina, It can always be appreciated when people engage in respectful conversations about complex issues, and I can imagine this can be uncomfortable. I would not consider myself an expert on this issue in any way, and I can't speak for the organizers. The possible encounters that you're describing in your latest email feel of a different order than the "incidients (sic) of harassment by males who identify as women" that you referred to earlier. I think with those harassment incidents, the organizers have been rather clear: harassment is unacceptable in any gender combination, in any situation. I hope this is at least clear.
What you're describing in your more recent email sound like practices that are a bit far-fetched (I cannot recall encountering these men performing such a "frequent and non-offensive action in men's restrooms" over my many years of using men's restrooms) but I can't be certain whether this is perhaps commonplace in other settings. I'm not sure how constructive it would be to exchange references to reliable sources supporting claims whether the behavior your friend fears, indeed is at all commonplace - but I would invite you to at least reflect yourself how common these incidents are compared to equally serious incidents that do not involve any gender-identification concerns, and whether you would feel those sources are solid enough that you would feel comfortable adding them to a Wikipedia article.
I hope you can appreciate that the organizers create a trans-inclusive environment where people don't have to rely on other peoples' judgement in deciding whether their gender is "correct" in respect to how they look. I am also assuming that any attempt to spell out a detailed policy on what is acceptable in bathrooms will quickly be met with exceptions and edge cases that will be uncomfortable to some. The more important cornerstone to me is the general Friendly Space policy and code of conduct which applies to this event: https://wikimania.wikimedia.org/wiki/2023:Friendly_space_policy and https://foundation.wikimedia.org/wiki/Policy:Code_of_conduct_policy . These provide general principles that you could interpret in specific situations, rather than trying to legislate every possible hypothetical. Important elements that I would consider in this case: "Be respectful in all interactions and communications. Be aware of your impact and how your contribution (messages, discussion, comments) may be affecting people. " and "Treat other people with respect".
Finally, I find it interesting that you choose to apologize for explicit language and perhaps mistaking the name of a department, but not for the possible feelings of rejection that your email could invoke with community members that might fall under your description of "AMAB individuals who self-identify as women". I hope you can imagine this is likely an uncomfortable conversation to them at least, and acknowledging this may not be enough, but is at least a small step towards this welcoming environment for everyone.
Best, Lodewijk
On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 2:57 PM Mina Theofilatou saintfevrier@gmail.com wrote: OK so I've finally found some time to sit at my computer and write a proper reply. I will refrain from addressing Z.'s concerns on my eligibility as a scholarship recipient (and all the related sarcasm) for Wikimania 2023 as I have already replied to that on the renamed thread "selection criteria".
I read through the comments on gender policy in this thread and I'm afraid that I will have to be somewhat explicit to get my point across.
I am 56 years old (my friend interested in attending Wikimania23 is several years older) and I have been to many conferences on four continents, I'd say over a hundred (not all Wikimedia-related of course). I am a cis-gender woman - apologies if I'm not using the right terms, until recently "woman" or "female" was enough to describe what I am - and naturally I have used dozens of women's restrooms (and locker rooms occasionally). Not once have I experienced a disturbing incident involving a man or male in a space designated for women because quite simply, I have never seen a man - a male-presenting individual, that is - using the space (except for the occasional "emergency", whereby the male uses the women's toilet and apologises for doing so if he encounters a woman while "relieving" himself. I've had to do the same on a few occasions in the men's toilets). Such was the situation in the pre-self-identification era. It is very possible that throughout the years I have encountered trans women in the women's restrooms without even being aware of it: a female-presenting trans individual in a space designated for women is naturally, perfectly acceptable and no cause for concern.
In the era of self-identification however, an individual who presents as a man - with a beard etc. features of a male physique - can self-identify as a woman (female) and proceed to use spaces designated for women. So, in the hypothetical case that this man who identifies as a woman exits the bathroom stall with his penis in his hand, shaking off the extra urine (apologies for being explicit) - a frequent and non-offensive action in men's restrooms, especially those with urinals - encounters a woman and the woman is offended, would she be entitled to express her discomfort to Trust and Safety? (apologies if the name of the dept has changed, that's the name I remember). Or would she get a reply along the lines of "we understand that you feel offended and that you experienced discomfort from the encounter, but our gender policy is self-identification and this man identifies as a woman so (s)he can use the women's restrooms and there's nothing we can do about it".
Same goes for AFAB individuals who are female-presenting but identify as men. A man using the men's toilets may feel discomfort at the sight of e.g. period blood and pads (again, apologies for the explicitness!) in a stall.
I have tried to describe the issue as respectfully as possible. Again, apologies for being explicit, it was inevitable. I do agree that *generally* Wikipedians are respectful of others and would *generally* not intentionally cause discomfort to others using gender-designated toilets - or worse yet, go so far as to harass - but if norms of common decency were self-evident to everyone, there would be no need for a Trust and Safety dept in the first place.
Best, Mina
Χωρίς ιούς.www.avast.com
On Sat, Jun 24, 2023 at 8:25 AM Željko Blaće zblace@mi2.hr wrote: Dear organizers - for the (self announced) transparency plan commitment of publishing list of scholarship grantees in May - it would be useful to do it at least in June as we are almost in July. It would also likely reduce the number of repeating questions. Best Z. Blace
On Sat, Jun 24, 2023 at 7:15 AM Mohd Sayeed sayeed8545@gmail.com wrote:
Did u get the scholarship?
On Sat, Jun 24, 2023, 12:05 AM Aryan Kumar Paswan pradipguhilote@gmail.com wrote:
trip to singapore kindly share list of candidate and is it free of cost?
On Fri, Jun 23, 2023, 22:52 Wikimania wikimania@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hi everyone,
Many of you are starting to plan your trips, and we’ve been receiving a lot of questions related to travel to Singapore: visas, vaccines, hotels, weather… We invite you to take a look at our Travel page on the Wikimania Wiki, with subpages for e-visas, attendee information, and accommodations. Feel free to leave a message on any relevant talk pages or reach out to us at wikimania@wikimedia.org if anything is unclear or incomplete.
To highlight one point–many countries are visa-free for Singapore, but everyone needs to fill out a Singapore entry card before arrival. Also Singapore requires a yellow fever vaccine from many countries–please see if yours is on the list!
Best,
Butch Bustria
On behalf of the Core Organizing Team
Wikimania-l mailing list -- wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe send an email to wikimania-l-leave@lists.wikimedia.org
Wikimania-l mailing list -- wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe send an email to wikimania-l-leave@lists.wikimedia.org
Wikimania-l mailing list -- wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe send an email to wikimania-l-leave@lists.wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________ Wikimania-l mailing list -- wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe send an email to wikimania-l-leave@lists.wikimedia.org _______________________________________________ Wikimania-l mailing list -- wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe send an email to wikimania-l-leave@lists.wikimedia.org _______________________________________________ Wikimania-l mailing list -- wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe send an email to wikimania-l-leave@lists.wikimedia.org _______________________________________________ Wikimania-l mailing list -- wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe send an email to wikimania-l-leave@lists.wikimedia.org
Hi Mykola,
You have obviously not followed the entire thread or paid close attention to the recommendations I have received from other participants in the discussion. I can't be sure if they were serious or sarcastic, but a couple of members suggested that I should write a Wikipedia article about these issues of my interest. To which I replied that any efforts I have made to add well-referenced input to *existing* articles on contentious topics (and gender is one of them, Covid-19 is another) have been met with vehemence, so I wouldn't spend time or energy on creating a new one. Hope this has helped you understand why I went off on a tangent.
As for the toilet issue, I read in one of the replies that there will be a gender-neutral toilet for those who prefer not to enter gendered toilets, which is a very considerate action on the part of the organisers. It seems however that the concerns of those accustomed to using gendered toilets and e.g. not expecting or wanting to see men in the women's toilets are enough to warrant their being called "transphobic".
Finally, what does a passport have to do with this? When did we ever have to show a passport to go to the bathroom? Is there not a reason for the existence of men's and women's toilets, locker rooms, fitting rooms etc.? How does a passport fit into the equation?
Best, Mina
https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail Χωρίς ιούς.www.avast.com https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 3:10 PM Mykola Kozlenko mycola-k@ukr.net wrote:
Hi Mina,
I am sorry, but what gender transition of minors and Covid-19 lockdowns have to do with Wikimania?
I don't have problems with people with alt-right views attending Wikimania. I have a problem when a discussion of safety at Wikimania turns into a discussion about gender transition of minors and Covid-19 lockdowns (both are extremely unlikely to happen at Wikimania in Singapore but are very popular discussion topics within alt-right groups).
The truth is that bathroom harassment comes way more often not from the fact that trans people can go to bathrooms matching their identities, but from people who decide to control strangers' gender in bathrooms : https://www.vox.com/2016/5/18/11690234/women-bathrooms-harassment
If the problem is harassment, then it should not be tolerated no matter the gender in your passport. And I very much hope nobody will have to show their passport to access a bathroom because it will just make everybody unsafe.
Mykola (NickK)
- 29 червня 2023, 10:22:35, від "Mina Theofilatou" <
saintfevrier@gmail.com saintfevrier@gmail.com>: *
Hi Lodewijk and Claudia and thanks for your replies.
Apologies if I used the wrong word in my original email: I agree with you that the situations I am describing are not harassment per se, so I used the word "discomfort" in the description of what I meant. Sincere apologies to any list members who may feel offended, that was not my intention. I was merely relaying the concerns of my friend, to the extent that they sounded reasonable to me.
As for your further comments, which go so far as to name me "transphobic", well that is one of the reasons I have distanced myself from the Wikimedia Movement at this stage. I had distanced myself in the past too, after an incident at Wikimania in 2016 which caused me severe discomfort (seems that "harassment" is a sensitive word so I will avoid it, even though it was acknowledged by T&S that it was indeed that. I got an apologetic email in private, even though I had specifically requested that any communication be public as was the incident. Z, if you're reading, I'm all for public communication when the issues being discussed have been initiated in public. To cut a long story short, I'm certain that the "Code of Conduct" and "friendly space policy" guidelines would command that shouting at and intimidating a fellow Wikipedian in a public space in the presence of many Wikipedians and a T&S staff member is not acceptable. Noone stepped in to stop the offender on the spot, not even the T&S employee: they just watched while I was being shouted at. I made a complaint and after months of investigation I managed to elicit a response from the "investigating" team. I had no choice but to make it public so I uploaded a screenshot of the email to Commons. I've linked to the screenshot below to help you understand what I am talking about, and why I have little confidence in Trust and Safety). I gradually gained back my confidence in the movement and participated for another four years, i.e. 2017-2021, but when I realised in 2022 that NPOV has gone totally out the window I'm through with the Movement.
Back to the "transphobic" name-calling: it seems that anyone who expresses the slightest concern about gender policies is easily branded as transphobic. Some even go so far as to brand them as "alt right". Blaire White, an extremely attractive and happy trans woman who is calling out the pressure being exerted on minors to transition at ages when the brain is still developing, is "transphobic". Scott Newgent is "transphobic". "What is a Woman '' is a documentary for "transphobics". Johanna Olson-Kennedy, who publicly addressed parents at a conference saying that "the good thing about double mastectomies is that if the girl regrets at a later point in her life, she can go ahead and get breasts" is a "hero". Why am I going into such detail? Well because two of the participants in this list encouraged me to write an article on Wikipedia about it. Have you any idea how difficult it is to express so much as an inkling of "the other side of the story" to a "contentious topic"? But isn't that what NPOV is supposed to be about? Any attempts I have made to add this simple sentence in a neutral manner with a reliable source to Johanna Olson-Kennedy's article was met with rapid reverts and even a deletion discussion. The result was "keep", but do you really think I am willing to expend more time and energy on edit-warring over edits that *used to be* perfectly acceptable? Same for my efforts on John Ioannidis's page: one of the most highly cited researchers in the world is being blatantly slandered for his objections to lockdowns during the Covid-19 crisis. By whom? By a certain globally unimportant doctor who goes by the name of David Gorski. Ever heard of him? Oh, but on Wikipedia his blog "Science Based Medicine" seems to be the epitome of reliability in anything from Covid to transgender procedures on underage girls.
I look at the history of articles. I also look at discussion pages, and quite frankly these are currently the most effective ways of obtaining reliable information on Wikipedia. So in one such session, when I looked at the history of "John Ioannidis" and noticed that I was not the only one trying to "inject" some NPOV into the Covid-19 paragraph of the article, I checked the contribs of the other editor and saw that he had edited the page "Irreversible Damage". That's how I learned about that book, which I ordered and read, along with TRANS by Helen Joyce (a notable author with an article on Wikipedia). Interestingly, Gorski was involved in this issue too: one of the co-founders of SBM had written a positive review for "Irreversible Damage: the Transgender Craze Seducing our Daughters", and the review remained on the website for seven months. Then, after *seven months* the article was taken down and a slandering ensued. Are we supposed to believe that the science behind the book changed 180 degrees in seven months?
Returning to the original issue, hmm. If everyone at Wikimania is so quick to be offended by the slightest concern about gender policies, then perhaps it's better if we """transphobic"""", """"conservative"""", """"alt-right""" folks (lots of quotation marks) simply not attend? I will relay this to my friend. It has been an enlightening discussion, thank you.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/02/Resolution_for_report_of...
https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail Χωρίς ιούς.www.avast.com https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail <#m_1263671826886242234_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 1:39 AM effe iets anders effeietsanders@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Mina,
It can always be appreciated when people engage in respectful conversations about complex issues, and I can imagine this can be uncomfortable. I would not consider myself an expert on this issue in any way, and I can't speak for the organizers. The possible encounters that you're describing in your latest email feel of a different order than the "incidients (sic) of harassment by males who identify as women" that you referred to earlier. I think with those harassment incidents, the organizers have been rather clear: harassment is unacceptable in any gender combination, in any situation. I hope this is at least clear.
What you're describing in your more recent email sound like practices that are a bit far-fetched (I cannot recall encountering these men performing such a "frequent and non-offensive action in men's restrooms" over my many years of using men's restrooms) but I can't be certain whether this is perhaps commonplace in other settings. I'm not sure how constructive it would be to exchange references to reliable sources supporting claims whether the behavior your friend fears, indeed is at all commonplace - but I would invite you to at least reflect yourself how common these incidents are compared to equally serious incidents that do not involve any gender-identification concerns, and whether you would feel those sources are solid enough that you would feel comfortable adding them to a Wikipedia article.
I hope you can appreciate that the organizers create a trans-inclusive environment where people don't have to rely on other peoples' judgement in deciding whether their gender is "correct" in respect to how they look. I am also assuming that any attempt to spell out a detailed policy on what is acceptable in bathrooms will quickly be met with exceptions and edge cases that will be uncomfortable to some. The more important cornerstone to me is the general Friendly Space policy and code of conduct which applies to this event: https://wikimania.wikimedia.org/wiki/2023:Friendly_space_policy and https://foundation.wikimedia.org/wiki/Policy:Code_of_conduct_policy . These provide general principles that you could interpret in specific situations, rather than trying to legislate every possible hypothetical. Important elements that I would consider in this case: "Be respectful in all interactions and communications. Be aware of your impact and how your contribution (messages, discussion, comments) may be affecting people. " and "Treat other people with respect".
Finally, I find it interesting that you choose to apologize for explicit language and perhaps mistaking the name of a department, but not for the possible feelings of rejection that your email could invoke with community members that might fall under your description of "AMAB individuals who self-identify as women". I hope you can imagine this is likely an uncomfortable conversation to them at least, and acknowledging this may not be enough, but is at least a small step towards this welcoming environment for everyone.
Best, Lodewijk
On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 2:57 PM Mina Theofilatou saintfevrier@gmail.com wrote:
OK so I've finally found some time to sit at my computer and write a proper reply. I will refrain from addressing Z.'s concerns on my eligibility as a scholarship recipient (and all the related sarcasm) for Wikimania 2023 as I have already replied to that on the renamed thread "selection criteria".
I read through the comments on gender policy in this thread and I'm afraid that I will have to be somewhat explicit to get my point across.
I am 56 years old (my friend interested in attending Wikimania23 is several years older) and I have been to many conferences on four continents, I'd say over a hundred (not all Wikimedia-related of course). I am a cis-gender woman - apologies if I'm not using the right terms, until recently "woman" or "female" was enough to describe what I am - and naturally I have used dozens of women's restrooms (and locker rooms occasionally). Not once have I experienced a disturbing incident involving a man or male in a space designated for women because quite simply, I have never seen a man - a male-presenting individual, that is - using the space (except for the occasional "emergency", whereby the male uses the women's toilet and apologises for doing so if he encounters a woman while "relieving" himself. I've had to do the same on a few occasions in the men's toilets). Such was the situation in the *pre*-self-identification era. It is very possible that throughout the years I have encountered trans women in the women's restrooms without even being aware of it: a female-presenting trans individual in a space designated for women is naturally, perfectly acceptable and no cause for concern.
In the era of self-identification however, an individual who presents as a man - with a beard etc. features of a male physique - can self-identify as a woman (female) and proceed to use spaces designated for women. So, in the hypothetical case that this man who identifies as a woman exits the bathroom stall with his penis in his hand, shaking off the extra urine (apologies for being explicit) - a frequent and non-offensive action in men's restrooms, especially those with urinals - encounters a woman and the woman is offended, would she be entitled to express her discomfort to Trust and Safety? (apologies if the name of the dept has changed, that's the name I remember). Or would she get a reply along the lines of "we understand that you feel offended and that you experienced discomfort from the encounter, but our gender policy is self-identification and this man identifies as a woman so (s)he can use the women's restrooms and there's nothing we can do about it".
Same goes for AFAB individuals who are female-presenting but identify as men. A man using the men's toilets may feel discomfort at the sight of e.g. period blood and pads (again, apologies for the explicitness!) in a stall.
I have tried to describe the issue as respectfully as possible. Again, apologies for being explicit, it was inevitable. I do agree that *generally* Wikipedians are respectful of others and would *generally* not intentionally cause discomfort to others using gender-designated toilets - or worse yet, go so far as to harass - but if norms of common decency were self-evident to everyone, there would be no need for a Trust and Safety dept in the first place.
Best, Mina
https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail Χωρίς ιούς.www.avast.com https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail <#m_1263671826886242234_m_-8386801440339898965_m_617256864847002357_m_-6370407639067422791_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
On Sat, Jun 24, 2023 at 8:25 AM Željko Blaće zblace@mi2.hr wrote:
Dear organizers - for the (self announced) transparency plan commitment of publishing list of scholarship grantees in May - it would be useful to do it at least in June as we are almost in July.
It would also likely reduce the number of repeating questions.
Best Z. Blace
On Sat, Jun 24, 2023 at 7:15 AM Mohd Sayeed sayeed8545@gmail.com wrote:
Did u get the scholarship?
On Sat, Jun 24, 2023, 12:05 AM Aryan Kumar Paswan <
pradipguhilote@gmail.com> wrote:
trip to singapore kindly share list of candidate and is it free of cost?
On Fri, Jun 23, 2023, 22:52 Wikimania wikimania@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hi everyone,
Many of you are starting to plan your trips, and we’ve been receiving
a lot of questions related to travel to Singapore: visas, vaccines, hotels, weather… We invite you to take a look at our Travel page on the Wikimania Wiki, with subpages for e-visas, attendee information, and accommodations. Feel free to leave a message on any relevant talk pages or reach out to us at wikimania@wikimedia.org if anything is unclear or incomplete.
To highlight one point–many countries are visa-free for Singapore, but
everyone needs to fill out a Singapore entry card before arrival. Also Singapore requires a yellow fever vaccine from many countries–please see if yours is on the list!
Best,
Butch Bustria
On behalf of the Core Organizing Team
Wikimania-l mailing list -- wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe send an email to wikimania-l-leave@lists.wikimedia.org
Wikimania-l mailing list -- wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe send an email to wikimania-l-leave@lists.wikimedia.org
Wikimania-l mailing list -- wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe send an email to wikimania-l-leave@lists.wikimedia.org
Wikimania-l mailing list -- wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe send an email to wikimania-l-leave@lists.wikimedia.org
Wikimania-l mailing list -- wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe send an email to wikimania-l-leave@lists.wikimedia.org
Wikimania-l mailing list -- wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe send an email to wikimania-l-leave@lists.wikimedia.org
Wikimania-l mailing list -- wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe send an email to wikimania-l-leave@lists.wikimedia.org
Wikimania-l mailing list -- wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe send an email to wikimania-l-leave@lists.wikimedia.org
I call for a forced stop on this thread and a block for the email address saintfevrier@gmail.com. It's quite clear why, and there is no reason to give this more attention.
Siebrand
I feel bad that the world is leaving this person and their friend behind - but I am glad Wikimedia does not feel inclined to stay in the past with them.
Please stop with the harassment on this mailing list, thank you.
(I last attended Wikimania about ten years ago - I've been trying to unsubscribe from this mailing list, but so far unsuccessfully, so I'm forced to watch this mobbing happen in real time.)
Hi folks,
Stepping in as a list moderator to 1) offer apologies to everyone that this off-topic discussion has gone on so long and 2) to note that I have put Mina's address on moderation. Recognizing that this is a heated and upsetting topic for many, and these discussions have a tendency to invite piling on, I have *also* put the whole list on moderation and plan to leave it on moderation through the end of Sunday. I am happy to quickly approve any messages from the conference organizers and messages directly relevant to Wikimania 2023 information.
This list is for discussing and getting information Wikimania: the upcoming conference and future planning. Questions about the conference are fine; concern trolling is not. I whole-heartedly support the statement that Butch posted on behalf of the CoT and WMF.
best, Phoebe
Thank for the update I need invitation because i want to apply for singapore visa
On Thu, Jun 29, 2023, 11:03 AM phoebe ayers phoebe.ayers@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
Stepping in as a list moderator to 1) offer apologies to everyone that this off-topic discussion has gone on so long and 2) to note that I have put Mina's address on moderation. Recognizing that this is a heated and upsetting topic for many, and these discussions have a tendency to invite piling on, I have *also* put the whole list on moderation and plan to leave it on moderation through the end of Sunday. I am happy to quickly approve any messages from the conference organizers and messages directly relevant to Wikimania 2023 information.
This list is for discussing and getting information Wikimania: the upcoming conference and future planning. Questions about the conference are fine; concern trolling is not. I whole-heartedly support the statement that Butch posted on behalf of the CoT and WMF.
best, Phoebe _______________________________________________ Wikimania-l mailing list -- wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe send an email to wikimania-l-leave@lists.wikimedia.org
wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org