On Jan 22, 2013, at 1:03 PM, Risker wrote:
Having to manually update Google+ is a serious
negative for its use: volunteer time is a very precious resource. Simply because other
groups (most of which have paid employees) are doing it doesn't mean that every group
ought to invest its limited resources in doing so. It's not a popular site, it's
resource-intensive to maintain, and most of the target audience on Google+ is also present
on at least one of the other locations that are regularly being maintained. I'd not
consider it a priority.
Risker/Anne
What Risker said. Wikimania 2012 had zero presence on Google+ so I wouldn't be
surprised if Wikimania 2013 made the same decision.
James Hare