Hi,
I tried to add a Mapillary picture as an image. Didn't work. Since the licenses agree I could copy the image to Commons, but that is too much effort and one loses the ability to scroll through the rest of the sequence.
Besides, when I'd upload pictures of artwork, they would be removed shortly thereafter due to lack of FOP in Belgium. So Commons is useless for most of my purposes (1000s of mapping pictures and specific pictures)
So, can we have a dedicated Mapillary property? I also want to use it as a source to prove that Q19368861 and Q19368857 are buried at Q2744459.
http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/YH8grZ9Y0gC37MzHx7neUw http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/_zlxQH0P9_sKuJjE9_NuBA
Jo
Hi Jo,
2015-03-02 6:32 GMT+01:00 Jo winfixit@gmail.com:
I tried to add a Mapillary picture as an image. Didn't work. Since the licenses agree I could copy the image to Commons, but that is too much effort and one loses the ability to scroll through the rest of the sequence.
Besides, when I'd upload pictures of artwork, they would be removed shortly thereafter due to lack of FOP in Belgium. So Commons is useless for most of my purposes (1000s of mapping pictures and specific pictures)
So, can we have a dedicated Mapillary property? I also want to use it as a source to prove that Q19368861 and Q19368857 are buried at Q2744459.
You can propose a new property here: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Property_proposal
(btw, I am also a user of Mapillary)
Ciao,
Cristian
There you go: https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Wikidata:Property_proposal/Refere...
2015-03-02 10:34 GMT+01:00 Cristian Consonni kikkocristian@gmail.com:
Hi Jo,
2015-03-02 6:32 GMT+01:00 Jo winfixit@gmail.com:
I tried to add a Mapillary picture as an image. Didn't work. Since the licenses agree I could copy the image to Commons, but that is too much effort and one loses the ability to scroll through the rest of the
sequence.
Besides, when I'd upload pictures of artwork, they would be removed
shortly
thereafter due to lack of FOP in Belgium. So Commons is useless for most
of
my purposes (1000s of mapping pictures and specific pictures)
So, can we have a dedicated Mapillary property? I also want to use it as
a
source to prove that Q19368861 and Q19368857 are buried at Q2744459.
You can propose a new property here: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Property_proposal
(btw, I am also a user of Mapillary)
Ciao,
Cristian
Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
On 2 March 2015 at 10:06, Jo winfixit@gmail.com wrote:
There you go: [...]
That's the link to edit the section; to read it, use:
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Property_proposal/References#Mapillar...
An aside:
There is an easy template for Mapillary images on commons along with a gadget which allows you to navigate Mapillary from that commons image. On mobile now but can send the links once I'm on a laptop, if noone beats me to it.
As a sidenote the template is intended to be used (substed) together with Magnus' url2commons tool.
------ André Costa GLAM-tekniker Wikimedia Sverige On 2 Mar 2015 13:56, "Andy Mabbett" andy@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote:
On 2 March 2015 at 10:06, Jo winfixit@gmail.com wrote:
There you go: [...]
That's the link to edit the section; to read it, use:
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Property_proposal/References#Mapillar...
-- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk
Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
On 02/03/15 16:07, André Costa wrote:
An aside:
There is an easy template for Mapillary images on commons along with a gadget which allows you to navigate Mapillary from that commons image. On mobile now but can send the links once I'm on a laptop, if noone beats me to it.
As a sidenote the template is intended to be used (substed) together with Magnus' url2commons tool.
André Costa GLAM-tekniker Wikimedia Sverige On 2 Mar 2015 13:56, "Andy Mabbett" andy@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote:
Another thought: since Mapillary seem to allow linking by geocoordinate: for example,
https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/bbox/55.53640250425626/55.89726132569528/12...
might it be also worth adding Mapillary as an option to Magnus' geohack page?
Neil
Sorry for the delay. The promised Commons links:
* Template to subst-ing: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:Mapillary * Gadget for navigating Mapillary from image: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Peterneubauer/mapillary.js (you have to stick importScript( 'User:Peterneubauer/mapillary.js' ); in your common.js to try it out) * Example image: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Camino_de_Oriente.jpg
And a prototype for finding and uploading Mapillary images to commons: https://tools.wmflabs.org/mapillary-commons/wlm-maps/#15/55.6086/13.0152
<End of aside>
That said I would agree that adding it to the geohack would make more sense than adding a specific Mapillary property. The few times when you have a specific Mapillary-image in mind it's probably worth sticking it on Commons as well.
/André
André Costa | GLAM-tekniker, Wikimedia Sverige | Andre.Costa@wikimedia.se | +46 (0)733-964574
Stöd fri kunskap, bli medlem i Wikimedia Sverige. Läs mer på blimedlem.wikimedia.se
On 3 March 2015 at 15:41, Neil Harris neil@tonal.clara.co.uk wrote:
On 02/03/15 16:07, André Costa wrote:
An aside:
There is an easy template for Mapillary images on commons along with a gadget which allows you to navigate Mapillary from that commons image. On mobile now but can send the links once I'm on a laptop, if noone beats me to it.
As a sidenote the template is intended to be used (substed) together with Magnus' url2commons tool.
André Costa GLAM-tekniker Wikimedia Sverige On 2 Mar 2015 13:56, "Andy Mabbett" andy@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote:
Another thought: since Mapillary seem to allow linking by geocoordinate: for example,
https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/bbox/55.53640250425626/55. 89726132569528/12.658309936523438/13.616867065429688
might it be also worth adding Mapillary as an option to Magnus' geohack page?
Neil
Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
2015-03-05 9:49 GMT+01:00 André Costa andre.costa@wikimedia.se:
That said I would agree that adding it to the geohack would make more sense than adding a specific Mapillary property. The few times when you have a specific Mapillary-image in mind it's probably worth sticking it on Commons as well.
Worth it, most probably. Possible? Often it won't be due to Freedom-of-Panoram unfreedom restrictions.
Jo