Have you seen this, English black people humans typically having a degree of Sub-Saharan African ancestry
- black man
- black woman
- black person
Spanish negro persona con una tonalidad de piel oscura
- persona negra
- raza negra
- raza africana
- mujer negra
- hombre negro
- negra
black is a color, white is a color, i think the word people should be removed.
you would see why here. https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P172 https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q269890 https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P140 https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q7325 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_terminology_for_race
But, it seems, this is not a reference to color (Q1075), rather to a person's color (Q2072081), whatever it's, of which everyone can be very proud.
Another issue is to add ethnic property (Q172). Personally, I have never thought of doing that. Human (Q5) has seemed more than enough.
And I sign my contributions, not like 80hnhtv4agou@bk.ru ;-)
Regards, GALoPaX https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Galopax https://www.linkedin.com/in/vvagr/
El 2020-06-21 a las 19:54, 80hnhtv4agou@bk.ru escribió:
Have you seen this, English black people humans typically having a degree of Sub-Saharan African ancestry * black man * black woman * black person Spanish negro persona con una tonalidad de piel oscura * persona negra * raza negra * raza africana * mujer negra * hombre negro * negra black is a color, white is a color, i think the word people should be removed.you would see why here. https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P172 https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q269890 https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P140 https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q7325 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_terminology_for_race
Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata