But, it seems, this is not a reference to color (Q1075), rather to a
person's color (Q2072081), whatever it's, of which everyone can be very
proud.
Another issue is to add ethnic property (Q172). Personally, I have never
thought of doing that. Human (Q5) has seemed more than enough.
And I sign my contributions, not like 80hnhtv4agou(a)bk.ru ;-)
Regards,
GALoPaX
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Galopax
<https://www.linkedin.com/in/vvagr/>
El 2020-06-21 a las 19:54, 80hnhtv4agou(a)bk.ru escribió:
Have you seen this,
English
black people
humans typically having a degree of Sub-Saharan African ancestry
* black man
* black woman
* black person
Spanish
negro
persona con una tonalidad de piel oscura
* persona negra
* raza negra
* raza africana
* mujer negra
* hombre negro
* negra
black is a color, white is a color, i think the word people should
be removed.
you would see why here.
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P172
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q269890
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P140
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q7325
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_terminology_for_race
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata